Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone tell me why Republicans are still throwing hissy fits over affirmative action?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:17 AM
Original message
Can someone tell me why Republicans are still throwing hissy fits over affirmative action?
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 11:17 AM by ck4829
Didn't we have a Department of Justice, that for the last 8 years, hired unqualified right wing partisan Republicans, but refused to hire qualified liberals?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5167623

Am I the only one who thinks that Republicans should be experiencing just a little bit of cognitive dissonance here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because they're still upset at any indication of a level playing field
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. wedge issue
they think they have one left here that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's white male victimhood
whipped into a frenzy by loudmouths on AM radio.

The yappers never point out the most pernicious affirmative action of all, the assisted living arrangements handed to dumb rich white boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. They are obsessed about race. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. one thing that pissed me off
Is that when Ferraro said that Obama was getting so much support was because he was African American, people like Pat Buchanan said "Yessss, this was OBVIOUSLY the face that they wanted to put on the Democratic party. She is right" Yet they claim that Sarah Palin was picked because of her qualifications and not just because she was a woman. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because advocating segregation nowadays is considered racist.
They have to whip up their racist base in a way that is more acceptable than cross burning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. The GOP use EMOTION as their form of populism. They believe
just saying certain words will set people off in a tangent.
Affirmative Action are just such words.

Those supposed Tea Parties this weekend is a perfect example.
A few people start then grows. No more bailouts leads middle
class think they are being put upon. EMOTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good Point. They can't see the beam in their own eyes, just the speck in the eyes of others. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well here's the start of an answer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. The prerequisite for cognitive dissonance is cognition.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because it is an issue on which they got a lot of traction
in the past... and right now they are desperately trying each and every message they can put out there to see if any can give them traction against the Obama juggernaut. They are trying all the old standards:

tax and spend liberals
socialism (or European style or OMG French)
Marxist/Communist
responsible taxpayers paying for irresponsible poor people
they're coming after your guns
pursuing the "homosexual agenda"
they're raising your taxes
bankrupting our kids future
redistribution of wealth

etc., etc... They haven't landed on one that has given them any traction lately... so why not trot out affirmative action and add it to the pile?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, I certainly can. It's because Affirmative Action is a *perfect* excuse for
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 12:40 PM by Marr
unsuccessful white men who've accepted the notion that professional success = superiority.

I've met a hell of a lot of guys who fit that description and, I think because I'm a blue collar white male myself, they assume I agree and tell me all about how they "would've been" this or that if "they" hadn't given the spot to a "black guy because of Affirmative Action".

I had a guy tell me that just a few weeks back. He's an unemployed acquaintance of mine. He was sitting on his fat ass saying he "would've been a fireman, but they gave the spot to a black guy".

"Really?", I asked. "He was less qualified?"

He didn't really respond. After a bit of discussion, it became clear that he'd never taken the *first step* to becoming a fireman-- not so much as the first fucking step. But here he was blaming his own laziness, his own failures, on a black guy who doesn't even exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moez Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. well.... they're only being reasonable.
after all, we do have a colored president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. they want their corporate benefactors to be able to continue to discriminate
. . . without any consequence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC