Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When praising Rush on Morning Joe, should Mike be forced to disclose she works with him?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:39 AM
Original message
Poll question: When praising Rush on Morning Joe, should Mike be forced to disclose she works with him?
As I posted on my blog (http://blog.windycitywatch.com/2009/03/so-this-is-why-mika-brzezinski-has.html#links)this morning and in another thread, I just found out today that Mika and Joe now host MORNING JOE on WABC-AM as the lead-in to the Rush Limbaugh Show (some of you apparently knew that). This morning Mika was extremely complementary of Rush and I couldn't figure out why, after a few minutes of searching I found out about the Limbaugh connection, which she didn't acknowledge.

My question is this. Should Mika acknowledge her professional relationship with Limbaugh before singing his praises on MSNBC? Afterall, whenever on-air talent at NBC and MSNBC mention GE they have to acknowledge it's ownership of the network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I voted yes.
but honestly, she repeats the Republican talking points so regularly these days (I mean, even before she was on the radio) that I feel like she would be defending Rush anyway. But I agree, it's EXTREMELY illuminating. I mean, not only did she complement Rush, but a "great thinker"...a great thinker? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Think about this. . .SHE HAS A FINANCIAL INTEREST in promoting Limbaugh. . .
. . .she is not doing WABC-AM for free, she gets paid to do it, so if Rush does well she does well, ADDITIONALLY how objective can she be of any of the HATEMONGERS ON WABC-AM because if she is critical of them they may not promote MORNING JOE on the radio, potentially bash her and make her life miserable at WABC-AM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. true
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 08:50 AM by ErinBerin84
And we all know how concerned Mika is about her taxes. In addition, I read an item recently that suggested she got an eye and boob job on her week off . Nothing wrong with that, but just don't bitch about having to pay higher taxes if you are going to spend money on that sort of stuff, Mika (if it's true).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
april Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think we should all send emails to the Morning Joe ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ask her if he snores while you're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah sure she'll acknowledge her relationship to Rush right after Andrea
Greenspan announces her relationship to Allan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course, but disclosure isn't one of msnbc's strong suits.
I'm still waiting for andrea mitchell and david gregory to come clean. :crickets:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hmmmmmm
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm on the side of the angels (o.p.) but does having a show scheduled mean "working WITH" somebody?!
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 10:36 AM by UTUSN
She irritates me to no end with her Shrub loving noises, but their radio show continued from their copycatting sL-IMUS. "Working WITH" sounds like LIMBOsevic's company HIRED them or PRODUCED them or something. The station determines the line-up, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah but a lot stations often have the hosts promote one another. . .
. . .it could be one of those scenarios where they give reciprocal announcements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC