Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ponzi Paranoia Is Rattling ‘Madoffed’ Companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:13 PM
Original message
Ponzi Paranoia Is Rattling ‘Madoffed’ Companies
Ponzi Paranoia Is Rattling ‘Madoffed’ Companies: Susan Antilla
Commentary by Susan Antilla


Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Ever since the Big Kahuna of Ponzi schemers was arrested on Dec. 11, financial firms and publicly traded companies have been rushing to quantify just how “Madoffed” they are.

Happiest among those who map out their vulnerability to Madoff in press releases, letters to customers, and regulatory filings, of course, are those who have none. Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Ltd. said Dec. 15 that “it has no exposure to funds managed” by Madoff, and that’s the cleanest sounding disclaimer you can get.

Saying you have no liability and actually having none, of course, isn’t always the same thing. In its December 2008 monthly report to investors, Stanford International Bank Ltd. said that it had “no direct or indirect exposure” to the Madoff virus. But it turns out it does. The Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this week accused Stanford of an $8 billion fraud, mentioning, among many allegations, that Stanford clients had money invested in the dreaded Madoff machine after all.

The Frontier Fund, a family of managed-futures funds, took the opportunity to tell investors that, not only did it not invest with Madoff, but it deserved credit because its operations were so different from those of the disgraced financier. “Important facts” that set Frontier apart from Madoff include regular filings with regulators, and its periodic reviews by the National Futures Association and Finra, the company said.

Of course, Madoff’s operation also underwent regulatory reviews, and we all know how that worked out. More important, Frontier boasts that it uses an auditor that people have actually heard of. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aSdHBvTvQqUk&refer=home





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not only do funds not disclose Madoff but we now have "Stanford Investments"
where one doesn't know if they buy into a fund whether the fund was invested with Madoff or "Sir" Allen.

It's all a crap shoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. easy money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC