Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dealing with the Banks--An outline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:04 AM
Original message
Dealing with the Banks--An outline
First--get an accurate accounting of the true value of the assets and liabilities of the large banks. This will require outside auditors, preferably government auditors. If private contract accountants are used, they should be assigned to tasks in such a way as to preclude their co-optation by the entities being audited. For example, accountants from different firms should be teamed together and nobody should be assigned to audit a bank with which they had a prior professional relationship.

Second--nationalize these banks. Using the data from the audits, determine the true present market value of each bank. Shareholders will be reimbursed by the Federal Government for the actual value of their shares.

Third--restructure the anking system as needed for efficiency. The restructuring may remain as an ongoing process so that the banking system can evolve as needed for changing economic circumstances in the future.

Fourth--disassemble the Federal Reserve and reassign its functions to the nationalized banking system.

And fifth--As evidence of prior criminal activity is turned up in the audit and accounting process, prosecutions of the bank executives will proceed. The IRS will be assigned to track down hidden assets. Given the worldwide scope of the financial crisis, the US will seek treaties with other nations that will permit the opening of bank records around the world to investigators for purposes of locating and repatriating the fruits of fraudulent activity.

Small privately owned banks will be permitted to operate, but strict rules will be reinstitute to define their bounds of operation, and they shall in no case be permitted to operate in more than one state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. You should send your idea to recovery.gov
if you haven't already. It is straightforward and makes a lot of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Everyone's Trying To Avoid Step One
Because the numbers will be shatteringly negative - which will be scary on its own, but also means that the value in step two will be negative.

Geithner and Summers do not want to see the Predator Class take a hit on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would never argue that my proposal would be easy, nor welcome
among those in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Some additional thinking on it - possibly too simplistic
Too simplistic on my part perhaps. You're comments will tell.

I understand that banks can currently leverage assets to the tune of 10:1 or 12:1. Reduce that by half to 6:1. Make every bank in the nation document its ability to meet the 6:1 with current assets. Some banks will not be able to bring enough assets to the table to make the cutoff. They must bring all the assets they can value to the table and the Government must inject funds to make up the difference plus a small cushion and at the same time take possession of all of the banks remaining assets in payment for the funds injected. The bank would then continue operation under its current management but with strict Federal oversight. The Government would then set up a separate corporation (much like the Resolution Trust from the failed S&L days) to depose of the captured assets within a reasonable time and at fair compensation to the people. Many of those previously unappraisable debt instrument will indeed pay off. Also, presumably many of them will include homes in foreclosure - and who better to allow people to stay in their homes than the Government, particularly if it already owns the paper?

This is my plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the fundamental problem with any private banking system
is that the interests of the bankers do not correspond well with the common good. Nevertheless, when they get themselves into trouble by pursuing their own interests (greed), we are called upon to bail them out because "they are too big to (be allowed to) fail." If they're so vital to our national interest, then it is vital that we own and control them. I see the present as a good time to establish ownership and control because they're awfully cheap right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree that now is the time to take them over but not because they are so cheap.
I think their price is irrelevent, if the banks are vital to the function of the nation then they must be in the total control of the nation, hence ownership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Right--I'm just saying that this is a golden (so to speak) opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. 6: Force them to return to their historic role of holding customer accounts
Edited on Sun Feb-22-09 11:34 AM by Joe Chi Minh
and providing other customer services. An end to their gambling operations, from which they have never ever made money, accruing it in a "bubble", then losing it all in one fell swoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. RE: # 5 - just make sure that's set up so that they can't claim they
didn't get a warrant or some other technical BS to where they get off and don't face justice for their crimes.

Other than that, sounds like a great plan - put back in place all the protections that were put in after the Depression to keep exactly this sort of thing from happening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC