Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prince of Darkness Denies Own Existence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:01 AM
Original message
Prince of Darkness Denies Own Existence
Prince of Darkness Denies Own Existence


Former Pentagon adviser Richard Perle: Neocons don't exist. How about the Prince of Darkness, though? (By Lefteris Pitarakis -- Associated Press)

By Dana Milbank
Friday, February 20, 2009; Page A03


Listening to neoconservative mastermind Richard Perle at the Nixon Center yesterday, there was a sense of falling down the rabbit hole.

In real life, Perle was the ideological architect of the Iraq war and of the Bush doctrine of preemptive attack. But at yesterday's forum of foreign policy intellectuals, he created a fantastic world in which:

1. Perle is not a neoconservative.

2. Neoconservatives do not exist.

3. Even if neoconservatives did exist, they certainly couldn't be blamed for the disasters of the past eight years.


"There is no such thing as a neoconservative foreign policy," Perle informed the gathering, hosted by National Interest magazine. "It is a left critique of what is believed by the commentator to be a right-wing policy."

So what about the 1996 report he co-authored that is widely seen as the cornerstone of neoconservative foreign policy? "My name was on it because I signed up for the study group," Perle explained. "I didn't approve it. I didn't read it."

Mm-hmm. And the two letters to the president, signed by Perle, giving a "moral" basis to Middle East policy and demanding military means to remove Saddam Hussein? "I don't have the letters in front of me," Perle replied.

Right. And the Bush administration National Security Strategy, enshrining the neoconservative themes of preemptive war and using American power to spread freedom? "I don't know whether President Bush ever read any of those statements," Perle maintained. "My guess is he didn't."

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/19/AR2009021903332.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. nice try, PoD... but no soup for you
neocons are very well documented, and were proud of the moniker in their heady days at the turn of the millennium.

Oh, and the days of "creating the reality" that the rest of us must accept are over.

My hope is that Perle, and all the other neocon fascist bastards, rot forever in the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. You know, I almost forgot about Richard Perle...
Almost.

One of the slimiest of the slimy, he is one of the few people on the planet for whom I truly do wish there is a hell where he can spend eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Perle harbors delusions.
lying sack o' excrement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. So in 1993 his name appears on a freaky neocon foreign policy
report and he waits until 2009 to tell us he didn't really write it? Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perle just might be correct that Bush didn't read those statements
we all know he wouldn't/couldn't read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Any verified stories out there of him asking for his name to be removed
from the report he didn't read and didn't approve?


*crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. p.m. kick. KO just covered this. Ah, denial is a wunnerful thing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. "I know nothing!" - Sgt Schulz from"Hogan's Heroes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC