Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pressed on multiple scandals, Bush takes Fifth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:34 PM
Original message
Pressed on multiple scandals, Bush takes Fifth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can just make out the profiles of George Dubya, Tony Blair and Jeff Gannon
...completely naked and playing with one another behind the label of that bottle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Holy cow--I think we have just inadvertently discovered
a whole new approach to projective testing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There you go TIT for TAT....
...on further examination I see Monica Lewinski and Monica Goodling both doing AG Alberto Gonzales underneath a six foot high Pinata

<snip>
Projective test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A projective test, in psychology, is a personality test designed to let a person respond to ambiguous stimuli, presumably revealing hidden emotions and internal conflicts. This is different from an "objective test" in which responses are analyzed according to a universal standard (for example, a multiple choice exam) rather than an individual's judgement.

The general theoretical position behind such a practice is that whenever you ask a "question", all you get in response is an "answer"; and, according to those who advocate projective tests, these answers, whilst providing genuine information on the matters raised by the questions, may have nothing to do with what is really on the subject's mind (and, from this position, what is really "the matter). Advocates of this approach stress that the ambiguity of the stimuli presented within the tests allow subjects to vent their inner thoughts. In many cases, however, this claim that it allows the subject to externalize whatever may be operating beneath their conscious awareness is often nullified by the testers' beliefs that certain responses have universally standard "meanings".

The best known projective test is the Rorschach inkblot test, in which a patient is shown irregular spot of ink, and asked to explain what they see; the response is then analyzed in various ways, noting not only what the patient said, but the time taken to respond, what aspect of the drawing was focused on, and how the response compared to other responses for the same drawing. If someone consistently sees the images as threatening and frightening, the psychiatrist may infer that he or she may suffer from paranoia.

Another popular projective test is the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) in which a patient views ambiguous scenes of people, and is asked to describe various aspects of the scene; for example, the patient may be asked to describe what led up to this scene, the emotions of the characters, and what might happen afterwards. The examiner then evaluates these descriptions, attempting to discover conflicts and hidden emotions within the patient, and work toward a successful psychoanalytic cure.

These tests have lost popularity as psychology has advanced. Many within the field no longer adhere to Freudian principles; the idea of repression that underlies the tests has been dismissed as false or outdated by many. Other criticisms concern the nature of the tests themselves. For example, it is observed that they can only be effective if the examiner interprets the responses correctly. Because they depend so heavily on the judgements of the examiner, some see projective tests as unscientific. However, a number of psychologists still use them as a way to get introduced to the patient in a nonthreatening manner.

Projective techniques, including TAT, are also used in focus groups for marketing research, for example to help identify potential associations between brand images and the emotions or responses they may provoke. The application of responses is different here to that in psychology, and the results from several respondents are grouped together for analysis by the organisation commissioning the research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes, a fifth of vodka.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. ROFL! and hiccup! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC