Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

School Districts to Provide the Names of Students Disciplined to the State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:04 AM
Original message
School Districts to Provide the Names of Students Disciplined to the State
http://www.villagesoup.com/Government/story.cfm?storyid=146079

ROCKLAND (Feb 13, 09): Maine School Administrative Districts 5 and 40 will provide the state with the names of students who have been disciplined.

The SAD 5 board -- representing Rockland, Owls Head and South Thomaston -- voted Thursday night, however, to send a letter of protest to Maine Department of Education Commissioner Susan Gendron.

The vote came after Superintendent Judy Lucarelli warned the board that if the district did not provide the names, the district could be penalized by a reduction in state aid.

The SAD 40 board also grudgingly reversed itself Feb. 5 and agreed to comply with the state demand for the names. The SAD 40 board -- which covers Waldoboro, Warren, Union, Friendship and Washington -- had voted Jan. 22 to inform Gendron that it would replace the names of the students with numerals or letters.

(snip)

The Five Town CSD, SAD 28 and SAD 40 are working with the Maine Civil Liberties Union to oppose the law. MCLU staff attorney Zachary Heiden argued in a letter to the state that Maine law prohibits the disclosure of personally identifiable information about children. He also debated the DOE's interpretation of federal law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wavesofeuphoria Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lemme guess ...
a provision stipulated by NCLB? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't know if it's part of NCLB
quote from the article:

The debate rests on a relatively new -- over the past few years -- requirement by the state that asks schools to report the names of students associated with any of 39 reportable incident types that result in disciplinary action that rises above a minor level, including in-school and out-of-school suspension of a half day or longer.

Those 39 incidents include those related to tobacco, alcohol or marijuana use, and those that result from assault, harassment, hate crimes, theft, truancy, vandalism, as well as "other school code violations."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. "other school code violations"............
Like dress code violations, inappropriate language, skipping class....?

Is there anyone who DIDN'T violate some school code at some point during high school? This is getting ridiculous.

The problem with reporting this type of crap is that once the records are out there, you need to worry about who will gain access like colleges or potential employers for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. have to track those "bad kids"
so they can be screwed for the rest of their lives by being "bad kids" in school. tracking kids in school is a nasty habit the adults in education have fallen into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Self-important, power-hungry, no-dick administrators absolutely
missing the point of public education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fight4my3sons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. what? !
I thought they decided NOT to do this. It is so wrong on so many levels.

It is sad that the state is making the districts do this by holding money over their heads.

Five Town CSD, SAD 28 voted against the consolidation so they might have a little more ground to stand on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. hey woman!
how ya doin?

Do you know who came up with this law? I think we need to make some calls, or write the asshat some letters. This is BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fight4my3sons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hey you!
I don't know who came up with the foolish law. I agree with you about the calls and letter writing though. :)

When is it going to warm up so we can hit the playground? I've got cabin fever running rampant over here! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. They should include Bush, Cheney, Rove, Libby, Gonzales and others in the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. This puts the school in a terrible position.
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 10:37 AM by surrealAmerican
Now if they sincerely want to protect their students, they'll have to neglect discipline entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC