Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keith just said two WH staff must testify, one is Rove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:03 PM
Original message
Keith just said two WH staff must testify, one is Rove
didn't get the name of the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow!!!!! Damn, why isn't this trial being televised?
I wanna see Fitz go after that POS KKKarl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But firedoglake is doing beautiful coverage.
Liveblogging, commentary, and then someone with a law degree explains it those of us who have gotten utterly lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the other inconvenient truth n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. testify
I am getting 'tingly' all over
This is only the beginning



Oh Meow!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. ROFL!!
Tingles all around!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's Bartlett. Yahoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Dan Bartlett, Director of White House Communications
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh my, how very delicious....
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 08:15 PM by Spazito
I wonder if he has been subpoenaed by the defense or the prosecution. I would normally assume it was the prosecution but, given the Libby defense team's opening statement saying Libby was the scapegoat in order to protect Rove, it sure could be either.

In the end, it doesn't matter, just having Rove on the stand, under oath, having to answer questions put to him by Fitzgerald is a delightful thought.

Edited to add: Just read that it is the defense that is responsible for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the Isiskoff Newsweek article Keith mentions:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. And pretty good reading it is, too. . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Defense is calling KKKarl
but it's Fitz that is slowly but surely manipulating the firing squad into a circle. The rats will turn against each other.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Keith says Rove will be forced to call Libby a liar
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. This just keeps getting better and better
:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Hi Darlin'!
Nice to see you laughin'. :hi:

King
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. KC
:hi:

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No denying it!
And, I've always felt like Bartlett was one of the biggest weasels! I don't mind seeing him get into the thick of it at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Won't Mind Seeing Them All Frogmarched
Which is an understatement, it will be back flip time (ouch).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. I knew the Fitz wasn't through with Rove!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Libby's team issued the subpoena. Remains to be seen if they will actually havel Rove testify.
It might not be as helpful to Libby as it might appear from the Isikoff article, especially by the time the prosecution (Fitz) gets done presenting its case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Not too far-fetched to think that Team Libby was maneuvered into
needing to play this card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Would You Give Up Libby To Get Rover?
Is there any chance he could make a deal now with Fitz, and turn on Rover somehow?

Is Rover at risk here to perjure or otherwise put himself at risk, i.e. Fitzgerald?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. In a heartbeat!
Rove is the evil behind two so called elections. Plus a lot swiftboat dirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I give up my favorite testicle to get Rove
and I'm REALLY fond of them both...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I'd give up my favorite testicle to get Rove...
and I bet my husband is REALLY fond of them both. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. LOL and a Perrier spray on the LCD screen
You're husband's a light sleeper no doubt???
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Let's See...Who In The White House Is Not Going To Be Called As A Witness?...
... Bartlet, Rove, Cheney.... who is left?? Hmmmmm .... If you said Bush, you're a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC