Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's A Tax Change I'd Like To See: Make All Home Improvents Tax Deductible.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:38 AM
Original message
Here's A Tax Change I'd Like To See: Make All Home Improvents Tax Deductible.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:42 AM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
Right now, all my friends or acquaintances I have that are in the construction industry are hurting severely and most about to lose their homes or already have. On of my friends is hurting so much he's going to divorce his wife just to spare her the credit damage. When it comes to the bad economy, you can bet your ass that a significant group that is affected by it greater than others is those who rely on construction/home improvement for a living. Fact is, so many people aren't spending money on things like non-emergency home repair these days. New roof? Nah. New carpet? No need. Repaint? Fuck it, the old paint is good enough.

But maybe if there was a tax deduction for such repairs/maintenance, or some sort of significant credit, some would be a bit more willing to have some of these things done.

My heart goes out to all those in the home repair field right now. They're really hurtin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd love to be able to deduct all the time I've spend remodeling my house
I've probably put in a couple thousand hours doing wiring, drywall work, and painting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Yep--my husband did it all himself--we never could have afforded to
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:47 AM by TwilightGardener
pay people to come and put in new windows for us, or kitchen cabinets and counters, or rebuild the porch and staircase, or plumbing, or wiring. That would have amounted to many thousands in labor, and we're nowhere near finished. I would love the luxury of hiring someone, though that will never happen as long as we're poor and my husband is able-bodied, LOL. But since we're not supporting an "industry" of repair and maintenance (beyond Menard's/Home Depot for materials), the OP's tax credit would be wasted on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. the tax code already favors homeowners
by making mortgage interest and property taxes deductable along with improvements that add to the value of a home (when the home is sold).

How about a renters credit instead. I'll be lucky if I'm able to own a home by the time I am 40.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. a home is an investment, like a business, in a manner of speaking. As such
a home should be entitle to all the deductions a business gets to make, IMO, whether that home is rented or owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Totally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. That sounds like a bail out for the very people who put us in this mess.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:42 AM by arcadian
The people who created the housing bubble. Real estate speculators/agents and building contractors. No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Ummmmmm, Could You Be Any More Misguided?
Roofers didn't get us into this mess. House painters didn't get us into this mess. Carpenters didn't get us into this mess. Kitchen refinishers didn't get us into this mess.

You couldn't possibly have missed the mark more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. the house flippers who hired those contractors did.
So the craftsmen aren't to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. Yeah, you're so altruistic, I'm sure all you care for is the little guy.
There were so many houses going up, contractors were hiring anybody with an opposable thumb who could swing a hammer. In a lot of cases those were people who were in this country illegally. Congratulations OMC, you are proposing a bail out for illegal immigrants. This is the most ill conceived original post I have EVER read on DU. In all of DU history! :rofl:



OMC's response: ROFLMAO!

Get a new shtick, you are too predictable and you are becoming a caricature of yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Just When I Thought You Couldn't Miss The Mark Any Further,
there you go proving yet again how far away you can get...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Have you ever seen those word magnets people put up on their refrigerators?
Where people create little poems and sentences from the random magnets provided? Most of the time the magnets just sit there, jumbled up, in a mess, but somebody while grabbing for the orange juice late one night has created a little sentence fragment while they chugged OJ from the carton, something like, "I like my bicycle". That is how I imagine your thought processes work and this OP proves it.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not a terrible idea. But only if it's an improvement to an existing condition.
It can't add significant value, such as an addition or putting in a pool. One would be double-dipping in that they'd get a tax credit AND get additional value on the home's value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. and it can't be done in order to *flip* the property
Part of the reason why we are where we are now is because of all the eedjits looking to make a fast buck by buying properties, slapping on a coat of paint, and then popping it on the market for 30% higher. This sort of BS should NOT be fired up, or given the opportunity to fire up again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. I Disagree.
I see no problem with having both.

Not including projects like that would stifle a lot of the work the proposal was to stimulate.

Now granted, it's not going to happen anyway, but just speaking in a rhetorical sense I see nothing wrong with getting a tax break for the improvement while also being able to someday sell your house for more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. so you basically have no problem with house flipping?
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I have a problem with it
and so should everyone else

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. So You Basically Have No Problem With People Raping Small Children?
God strawmen are stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. what an absolutely DIM argument
But hey, what other good ideas have you got? Putting small children to work on cleaning out meatgrinders? After all, those kids have to eat too, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. You're Projecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. I don't think OMC is supporting house flipping.
Maybe I am reading it wrong but he looks like he is supporting improvements that,while they probably do increase value,their main purpose is for the homeowners use.Think along the lines of updating kitchens or enlarging bathrooms.Another area to consider is upgrades or additions of solar or other alternative energy sources.Or replacing older inefficient heat/air and water heaters.Things like this will add value but if they are not done with the specific intent of adding to the value but for the homeowners use or for 'greening' a house they should be deductible.

Flippers,on the other hand,should get no tax breaks.In fact taxation should be set up to discourage flipping,imo.Flipping causes to many problems for it to be allowed.(I might consider breaks for greening a house.)

But how to tell the difference between the two. It's easy.If you dont live in the house and have no intention of living in or renting the house then you are a flipper.Set tax law up so that you must be getting a homestead/primary residence exemption as a prerequisite for claiming the deductions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yup.
It would be quite easy to add stipulations to the proposal, and they would be no brainers.

Furthermore, under current tax law, aren't those home improvements already deductible if it's considered part of fixing up the house for sale and it is sold within 90 days of the repairs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. What about disability access...
?

It seems that with an aging population there would be more need for this type of home improvement. Maybe a free coupon system for people on fixed income or disability who are aging into accessibility issues in their lives. It would give construction people work, allow people to live at home more easily, cut-down on the predators that take advantage of this demographic, and generally enhance relationships and community because of the spill-over effect. This could apply to basics like roofing, furnaces, electrical box repairs, etc. for old people in old houses.

????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Thats not a bad idea.
Some kind of protection system has to be in place,though.A lot of older people got ripped off by unscrupulous contractors in Atlanta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. That's why I was thinking a coupon system...
coupon to recipient to validate need for work wrt safety or quality of life issues then the coupon would be redeemed by worker after quality and appropriateness of work is verified. An argument might arise that it would bloat bureaucracy but lack of oversight can be extremely more expensive. Besides, I don't see bureaucracy as necessarily a bad thing because many people are invested in doing a good job and problems arise from mixed signals or bad examples from the top. The latter is why I think of corruption as cancer.

thanks for your reply, it is an interesting idea to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Forgive student loans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jemsan Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. AMEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I agree
and I don't even have any. The industry is corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Perhaps a deduction for a few years atm
but as a permanent change this doesn't make sense. The reward for the owners is suppose to be the increased equity of their investment. Redoing your home is not a necessary burden and thus should not create a deduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. This Isn't About The Owners. It's About The Workers.
We need something to give more people the incentive to seek out this kind of work.

But yes, it should be sunsetted once the economy is back on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. Only if they are energy related - insulation, Energy Star windows, solar energy devices.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. That Is Completely Illogical To The Proposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. no it is not
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe they'd be hurtin' less if they didn't charge so much.
I had some rot around the base of my back door.

Got three estimates to fix it and the lowest was $1,200.

I fixed it myself for $100 and a bit of labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. Most Of Them Charge What Is Necessary To Make A Living.
Most of them are fair, though lord knows the industry has it's share of rip-offs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. How about bigger deductions for Green improvements?
Make tankless water heating and solar more competitive to conventional methods. You help build a new industry in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Separate Topic.
Didn't say this is the only proposal that should be considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. Tell me more -- are you talking a deduction based on a formula and applied to annual income taxes
every year, or do you mean a deduction from property taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. Or, alternately, not paying sales tax on the supplies/labor?
I'm hoping you don't have me on ignore, which is possible -- I'm interested in this suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. That would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. Of course - stick it to the poor! Yeah, good idea.
:eyes:

Why not just say that anyone who makes more than $50,000 doesn't have to pay taxes, and anyone under $50,000 has to give the government half what they make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. That's about what we already have, except the non-paying level is higher.
Consider the source.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Consider The Source.
Closed minded zealots knee jerking in response. Surprise surprise. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Could You Be Any More Closed Minded?
First of all, those in the construction industry are largely becoming 'the poor'.

Second of all, proposing this doesn't mean that all other considerations for others as it relates to assistance should no longer be considered and thrown away instead.

Never ceases to amaze me how limited in thought and creativity some are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Yes, of course I could be more closed minded. I have lots of room to go in that direction.
Giving people deductions for fixing things that only the more-affluent can afford is a closed minded position.

It's not really much different - in principle - from offering a tax deduction for buying a Hummer.

Like the child deduction punishes the childless, a credit for home repair punishes renters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
36. I think that's a good idea
It would help me be able to fix up my old house and put someone to work at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Exactly.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
42. Essential repairs for your primary residence -- you bet!
Leaving repairs undone because you can't afford them can be dangerous or unhealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
47. I love this idea
Not to mention the boost it would give to the economy, both in manufacturing and retail.

I like it alot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC