Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even with Space-Launch Capabilities, Iran's Threat Level Remains Low

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:38 PM
Original message
Even with Space-Launch Capabilities, Iran's Threat Level Remains Low
Two days after Iran launched its Safir-2 rocket, on the 30th anniversary of the country’s Islamic Revolution, many are speculating as to what sort of weapons-ready technology president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad now possesses.

Iran claims to be merely celebrating the technological achievement of Omid-1, which means “hope” in Farsi, putting them on par with the United States, Europe, Russia, China, Japan, India and Israel—the only countries to independently launch spacecraft into Earth orbit. “This is a scientific and technical achievement and has no military aims,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi said today, according to the state’s news agency.

Some don't believe this is the case. UN Security Council Resolution 1718 prohibits Iran from engaging in missile-related activities, and there are obvious technological crossovers. “(This) is clearly a concern of ours,” Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said at a news briefing today. “Obviously, there are dual-use capabilities in the technology here which could be applied toward the development of a long-range ballistic missile.”

Last August, Iran test-fired a Safir rocket using its most advanced ballistic-missile system, the Shahab-3, as the first stage. (The first- and second-stage engines are interchangeable between missiles and rockets because they pass through the same flight environments.) Monday’s multistage rocket—whether it was a two- or three-stage rocket remains unclear—was a testament to the Iranians’ technological evolution, because they had long struggled to progress beyond single-stage missiles. With the increased range, NATO estimates a missile could reach parts of Europe or Israel. But converting the Safir-2 into an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) would still require a few key transformations.

Even beyond the obvious question of whether Iran would have a nuke to put in an ICBM, the rocket would need a vastly increased payload. The Omid satellite launched Monday weighed approximately 60 pounds. The W54, generally considered the smallest U.S. nuclear warhead, weighs just over 50 pounds—but making things small comes with experience, and Iran doesn’t have that. Even second-generation American nuclear warheads weighed 1,600 pounds.

MORE...

POPULAR MECHANICS: http://www.origin.popularmechanics.com/blogs/technology_news/4302539.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know, we wouldn't be bothering them if they were a real threat
Consider how we treat other nuclear nations(even those with very limit capacity). If I wanted a place at the international table, that's one of the first things I would get, if I were in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC