Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State Workers Call for Impeachment of Schwarzenegger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:08 PM
Original message
State Workers Call for Impeachment of Schwarzenegger
http://www.inglewoodtoday.com/news/news/1650-state-workers-call-for-impeachment.html

State Workers Call for Impeachment

Labor unions and employee associations around the state are taking steps to unseat Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. At its quarterly meeting on an. 11, the Assn. of California State Supervisors (ACSS) board of directors voted unanimously to call for the governor¢s impeachment. "His inability to pass a budget is placing California in financial jeopardy, and his order to cut state workers' pay by 10 percent, to place the burden of balancing the budget on our backs, is an act of malfeasance," said President Olin King.In the discussion before the vote, ACSS board members accused the governor of breaching his fiduciary duty, missing deadlines, managing "with smoke and mirrors," fiscal mismanagement, incompetence and a failure to exercise proper leadership.Further, the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's office issued a report recently, calling Gov. Schwarzenegger's 2009-2010 budget resolution "risky." The state's financial analysts say the state could run out of cash next month. Only the Legislature can impeach the governor. ACSS is urging California voters to contact their legislators. Voters can send the letter as-is, posted on the ACSS website, or edit or write one of their own. Pointing to California¢s deficit, projected at $40 billion, the ACSS went on the attack, stating in the letter:"We are facing the worst financial crisis of our lifetimes. A governor should be able to bring both sides of the aisle to a consensus, but this governor can't even get his own party to work with him. snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. EVERYTHING BLACKBLACK HAS DONE IS A FRAUD
WHEN WILL ISSA BE PUT IN PRISON??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well then...I guess everyone should be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Is everyone eligible to be impeached?
An Ahnold fan I see.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're wrong. I am saying that some accusations could be applied to others also.
I think Impeachment has to be for crimes. Now humanistically some things ARE crimes but I am talking legal crimes because "accusations" can be thrown at anyone including Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. does someone need to give Arnie a BJ and then talk?
That always gets 'em impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. BC didn't get impeached for the BJ - he got impeached for LYING about it under oath
.
.
.

USA is an interesting country

while it slaughters innocent women and children across the globe,

a wee bit of sex like even a 3 second exposure of JJ's nipple creates more outrage

strange country indeed . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. BC didn't get impeached for LYING about it under oath
He got impeached for being a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. As far as our government is concerned...
"Crime" is in the eye of the beholder. If the citizens cry foul, it is not a crime. If the "Justice" Department, or politicians cry foul, it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. What will fix California's troubles? I guess when the remedy is found, someone...
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 07:15 PM by LakeSamish706
can pass it on to the rest of the States.

I seriously think that Bush's Mis-Administration is 99.9% to blame for this whole situation that exists in the world today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The GOP is 99.9% to blame for the situation California is in now.
Never forget the "energy crisis" in the summer of 2000 and the "recall" of then-governor Davis, who had plans to shore up the budget.

He saw it coming, he had plans for it.

The GOP set him up to install their Great Aryan Hope.

Davis was/is the nerd's Eliot Spitzer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. BINGO CITIZEN
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 08:20 PM by HowHasItComeToThis
REPUBLICAN PARTY SHOULD BE HELD UNDER THE RICO ACT

P.S. LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN EUROPE

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/31/global-recession-europe-protests


Governments across Europe tremble as angry people take to the streets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. Too bad people here don't have that courage.
Edited on Sun Feb-01-09 04:29 PM by bobbolink
:shrug:

Thank you for posting that... very interesting article.

If only......:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GReedDiamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Gov Davis had several lawsuits pending...
...against the "big energy" fraudsters, Enron being the most infamous among them, that would likely have brought 9 billion $$ back to the State's ratepayers, if it were not for the Gropenator's taking advantage of GOP stooge Issa's recall campaign and successfully winning the fabricated recall election. Steroid Brain's first priority as Governor was to derail the lawsuits by "settling" them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Gropenator wasn't waiting innocently for Issa; he was deep in the shit.
He attended a meeting in 1999 with members of the GOP energy cell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. word
this was shoveled under the rug very quickly so that the sheeple would forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. It only took them THIS long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. the CA legislature is responsible for passing a budget. He vetoed a passed budget nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Along with every other obstructionist bullshit he did for his party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. That budget was a fraud and would never have stood up in court
However, The Gropenator did not veto it for that reason, so that approach may well be tried again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bad call, in my opinion. State managers ought to be calling for the state Legislature
to present realistic, and timely, budgets. They have a history of not meeting the mark most years.

A good start would be to replace the two-thirds vote requirement on taxation with a simple majority, which it was for a long time, and closing the loopholes on Prop 13.

I understand their anger, they are non-union, salaried employees of the state. Yet, throwing an impeachment proposal into the works helps no one.

I see they have a March State House lobbying day. Maybe they could advocate for some realistic solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Time for A Sequel to "Total Recall"
Long past time, actually. Send Arnie back to Hollywood!

http://www.democracynow.org/2003/10/6/schwarzenegger_accused_of_involvement_in_9b
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL! Fuck yeah! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hey, State Workers ... this Californian wants to be the first to sign.
My friends work for Social Services and the Public Defenders' Office - Arnie is putting people in jeopardy with his orders (children AND adults).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Actually its the legislature not the Gropenator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. B.S., with all due respect.
The Gropenator has thus far refused to cooperate with the legislature's efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The real issue is the lack of a super majority willing to raise taxes
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 09:57 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
The Gropenator can not control the Repukes in the state legislature. Not defending him, there is enough to hold him accountable for without adding stuff he can not control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. there is a bunch of republicans that are holding the state hostage
because they refuse to vote for tax hikes or other measures to bail out the state. remember california, you guys passed the super majority instead of having a simple majority. best get rid of those republicans who pledged to never raise taxes while they watch 13% of this nation`s gnp go bankrupt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. ding ding ding...we have a winner
While many blame The Gropenator, he has never had any real say with the repuke legislators. The repukes in the legislature are holding the state hostage via the super majority requirement in the CA constitution.

Not saying that the Gropenator is one of the good guys, its that we can not blame him for the deeds of the legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. That took long
About time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. Mr. H and I are going to be in deep shinola if Calif goes bankrupt. The Governator IS a Republican
Never forget that (R) after his name.

Anyhow, after a lifetime of living below our means -- our means being a modest community college prof's salary -- saving for our retirement, saving for a rainy day -- we are now watching our mutual funds etc tanking. We NEED that pension. We don't have TIME to recover. We especially need the medical plan, because we are uninsurable on the open market. We are 61.

Hekate
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. About Time
Arnold as Guv just shows the empty heads of many of my fellow Californians at time of the recall.

The fellow has no qualifications to be Guv.

I like the idea of smart, flexible, and efficient government rather than ideology or special interests.

Both Browns were competent governors and politicians at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. California is a difficult state to govern - California is unique and special
.
.
.

I lived there from 80-81 - San Diego

Domiciles included Mission Valley - National City, Chula Vista, Bonita, and some I don't recollect at the moment, but all were SanDee to me -

Most of the people I met were great,

but many weird - in that they lived "unregulated" sort of -

I was only 29-30 back then - having a great time with all these California girls that luved this Canuck with the funny accent . .

BUT

I did notice a few things

like the Vietnam vets YOUNGER than me with parts missing and psychological problems

QUESTION

When did California have a Governor it liked??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Probably Raygun...? {nt}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. YESsssssssss!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
31. I still don't know how he got elected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
33. He refused to sign a budget the legislature passed a little more than a month ago
now that's malfeasance.

that refusal means that the state is now running out of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. so...he's causing this.
or i should say, pete wilson's causing this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. yes he is
he said he wouldn't sign their budget because it didn't contain "stimulus".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. No he is not, the reukes in the legislature are
The Gropenator has little to no control over his fellow repukes. The super majority rules are alllowing them to hold the entire state hostage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. The budget in question would clearly have been thrown out by the court
Edited on Sun Feb-01-09 12:18 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
It was an end around black letter law in the CA constitution in terms of raising money. Presumptively they have gotten some better legal advice since then the legislature has not tried that stunt again. Besides he vetoed it...

The real issue is the super majority requirement.

Not defending the Gropenator but the real issue is the repukes in the CA legislature whom he has no influence or control over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. the 2/3 majority requirement to pass the budget has got to go
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. It will take an intiative to do that, and it will be a very hard sell to the voters in California
I teach at a public university here in CA. I am in the crosshairs on this issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. they managed to get the threshold down to 55% on school bonds
through an initiative.

who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
34. oh, finally! that's music to my ears.
take my governor, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC