Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aide: Holder Has Made No Decisions On Prosecuting Bush Officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:56 PM
Original message
Aide: Holder Has Made No Decisions On Prosecuting Bush Officials
An aide to Eric Holder rejected a report Wednesday suggesting that the Attorney General nominee had pledged not to prosecute members of the Bush administration officials who were complicit in illegal harsh interrogations or torture.

"Eric Holder has not made any commitments about who would or would not be prosecuted," said the aide. "He explained his position to Senator Bond as he did in the public hearing and in responses to written questions."

The statement came hours after the Washington Times quoted Senate Judiciary Committee member Kit Bond saying Holder had privately insisted that he would not conduct such prosecutions. That report caused a stir on the Hill, where Democrats were left wondering whether Holder had privately placated Republican concerns that he would investigate Bush administration officials involved in interrogations.

Publicly, Holder has tried his best to be non-committal on what he would do in regard to torture investigations saying "nobody is above the law," but that he didn't "want to criminalize policy differences that may exist" between administrations. Because he defined waterboarding as torture during his confirmation hearings, it was assumed that he would have a responsibility to investigate the Bush administration admission that they have used waterboarding on a select few detainees. But in a question form offered to Republican Senators on Judiciary he was much more vague (indeed, cold to the idea) when asked if he would prosecute the matter.


more:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/28/aide-holder-has-made-no-d_n_161971.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet another FAIL for the Washington Times. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Forget bush officials, he should go get limpballs
I just clicked on another thread and saw a picture of that fatass druggie pedophile.

Can't he still be prosecuted for drug abuse? Child molestation? Overdue library books? Fucking parking violations? Anything? Buelleer?

I don't hate anybody but I sure come pretty close with that fat piece a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHandPath Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bond should resign... just for asking.
Did he and Specter really ask an AG nominee to deter prosecutions for their vote?

How is this any different than Blogo asking for favors for a Senate seat?

I think Bond needs to be prosecuted for obstruction of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of Course, The Story Was Obviously WT/Repub Propoganda
Never believed it for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC