Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Welfare Queens Gone Wild Update: Looks like this Welfare Queen won't be getting that private jet....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:20 PM
Original message
Welfare Queens Gone Wild Update: Looks like this Welfare Queen won't be getting that private jet....
from the Financial Times:



Treasury forces Citi to cancel jet order
By Krishna Guha in Washington and Francesco Guerrera in New York

Published: January 27 2009 19:32 | Last updated: January 28 2009 00:37


The US financial sector’s new political masters began exerting their influence on Tuesday as Citigroup was forced to scrap the purchase of a $50m executive jet that was seen as a misuse of money at a time when the bank is reliant on public support.

Only a day earlier, Citi had insisted it would complete the acquisition of the aircraft. But it backed down after officials acting for Tim Geithner, the new Treasury secretary, expressed strong opposition to the move.

Mr Geithner’s action came as he raced against time to change public perceptions of the government’s bank rescue effort – the troubled asset relief programme inherited from the Bush administration.

The Obama team wants to move forward with a comprehensive bank clean-up and recapitalisation programme. Senior Wall Street executives said yesterday that they had been sounded out on plans for an “aggregator bank” that would purchase toxic assets from banks.

Under one of the plans discussed, toxic assets would be valued by an independent third party. Where assets are purchased at prices below their book values, the government might then inject common equity into the banks to make up for capital wiped out by the sales.

Mr Geithner and his colleagues know that any full-scale overhaul of the financial sector will almost certainly require more funds from Congress. So their immediate priority is to restore confidence in the recapitalisation process, which polls suggest is deeply unpopular. An essential element of this is convincing the public that the money is being used in ways that benefit the wider economy. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e4093646-eca6-11dd-a534-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't know Bank CEOs were Gay n/t
I guess they're not all bad after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. These guys,(and I'm sure they're mainly guys),are so out of
touch with reality it boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. they don't "get it" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, why did we give Citi all that money?
Geez, if their big shots can fly around in their own executive jet, what's the point of being a corporate big shot? We didn't give them all that money for them not to buy a bunch of executive goodies? Well, ain't that a kick in the head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Were they ever really in financial trouble?
It doesn't seem like they're on the edge of insolvency.

It's time to open the books on Citi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think the author meant to say "$50M" - upper case "M".
Complete "piece" indeed.

I didn't register to read the rest of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC