Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Slumdog" child stars miss out on the movie millions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:00 AM
Original message
"Slumdog" child stars miss out on the movie millions
Somehow, the phrase "more than three times the average annual salary an adult in their neighbourhood would receive" just doesn't seem right. So they are using a slum neighborhood "salary" average to justify what the kids were paid??



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/4347472/Poor-parents-of-Slumdog-millionaire-stars-say-children-were-exploited.html

Their roles in Slumdog Millionaire have won them international acclaim and seen them rub shoulders with the film’s glamorous stars and its British director. Their roles in Slumdog Millionaire have won them international acclaim and seen them rub shoulders with the film’s glamorous stars and its British director.


The film’s British director, Danny Boyle, has spoken of how he set up trust funds for Rubina and Azharuddin and paid for their education. But it has emerged that the children, who played Latika and Salim in the early scenes of the film, were paid less than many Indian domestic servants.

Rubina was paid £500 for a year’s work while Azharuddin received £1,700, according to the children's parents.

However a spokesman for the film’s American distributors, Fox Searchlight, disputed this saying the fees were more than three times the average annual salary an adult in their neighbourhood would receive. They would not disclose the actual sum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't the brit have to consider the Indians to be human beings, I'd bet he was forced to pay them
at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Exploiters. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. £500 = 34,617.30 INR = 708.3450 USD
Edited on Tue Jan-27-09 11:11 AM by Earth_First
Am I doing this right?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. no wonder the indians threw out the british...or did they
Edited on Tue Jan-27-09 11:17 AM by madrchsod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well if someone came to my neighborhood and said
they could pay me three times the average annual salary of the adults living in my neighborhood. I would take the money!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah, if that's the case, I don't have a problem with it.
great movie, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serrano2008 Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. If they weren't happy with it, why didn't they ask for more money sooner?
Or why did they do it at all? I dont' work on a project or job unless I'm happy with the compensation beforehand. I don't think these people were held against their will, as slaves to do the work and accept less money.

Instead they should be grateful for the opportunity to be in the movie and use it for their advantage to try to get in other movies. Now other directors will just think they're complainers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. They'll be in more films. They did such a great job in this one,
They will have other chances, even if they are complaining now. And frankly, you can't really blame them too much, given how successful the film has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. What a revelation, the film industry is run by scum. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC