Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: DoJ claims this batch of e-mails was "overlooked" in past searches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:16 PM
Original message
NYT: DoJ claims this batch of e-mails was "overlooked" in past searches
Translation: the huge document dump earlier this week was a head fake



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/24/washington/24attorney.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Department officials said there had not been an intentional effort to delay the release of the new material. Instead, they said, the e-mail messages were overlooked in past searches of office files and computers. Many, they said, were copies of e-mail that had already been disclosed. The latest batch of documents shows just how completely the department misjudged what the reaction would be to the dismissals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL - just posted an ABC report saying the DOJ is blaming it on some
shmoe who was on vacation...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x490890
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He must've took the email servers with him on vacation. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i guess they still can't get their story straight n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh My...How EmBARRASSING.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Which means....
they're still hiding the really incriminating stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Takes them a week to come up with fake documents.
Like the ones Rove finally gave to Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC