Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New CNN Poll: Most (68%) see Bush presidency as a failure, 44% say due to "personal shortcomings"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:51 AM
Original message
New CNN Poll: Most (68%) see Bush presidency as a failure, 44% say due to "personal shortcomings"
Most see Bush presidency as a failure, poll shows



http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/18/poll.bush.presidency/index.html

By Paul Steinhauser
CNN Deputy Political Director

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- As George W. Bush spends his final days in office, a national poll suggests that two-thirds of Americans see his presidency as a failure.

Sixty-eight percent of those questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Sunday said that Bush's eight years in the White House were a failure, with 44 percent saying this was because of his personal shortcomings and 22 percent blaming the failure on circumstances beyond his control.

Thirty-one percent said they consider Bush's presidency a success.

Half of those polled say the United States could be better off today if Al Gore had been elected president in 2000 rather than Bush, with 27 percent saying the country would be worse off if Gore had won. Twenty-two percent say things would be about the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I assume the remaining 32% see it as
an utter catastrophe of epic proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I would have said other. EPIC FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. "22 percent blaming the failure on circumstances beyond his control."
oh yes... "who could have imagined {fill in obvious result here}"

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. In order for Bush to have prevented the 9/11 attacks, he would have needed some kind of advance memo
Something like "bin Laden determined to strike in the U.S.," as an example, some kind of intelligence briefing giving him advance notice of the intent to strike, and then he could have...

...what's that? He GOT a memo in August, and it was actually CALLED "bin Laden Determined To Strike In The U.S.?" And he shrugged it off? Well...never mind then.

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. As the record clearly shows, EVERY action of the Cheney/Bush regime prior to 9/11 was CONTRARY ...
Edited on Sun Jan-18-09 11:17 AM by TahitiNut
... to the prevention, detection, and preclusion of the 9/11 atrocities. It's NOT just that they ignored the August PDB, it's that they deliberately discontinued and disabled activities that may have prevented 9/11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Olbermann's post-mortem of the "farewell speech"...
...included a reference to Bush's "outsourcing" of the post-9/11 hunt for bin Laden, at a time when there was an excellent chance of actually taking him "dead or alive," to the Pakistanis...who were "sympathetic" to bin Laden's "agenda" and instrumental in hiding him in the first place.

The Olbermann clip is somewhere in the Political Videos forum...worth hunting down and watching if you haven't already. When you watch the Bush administration's failures in such a time-compressed manner, it's truly a "beyond belief" experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I Think Every American Needs to Read "The Sociopath Next Door"
want to know why the country is so fucked up? We have a bunch of sociopaths running things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ah well we know Gore won
the 2000 elections. Fugg not so goody (as in lousy) two shoes. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. His base thinks his "personal shortcomings" are his virtues. I find that interesting.
It is not a shortcoming to think of oneself as an agent of truth.

What is a shortcoming is thinking of oneself as The Agent of The Truth, especially when one is so historically and contemporaneously ignorant.

I wonder how many of Bush's 22% are capable of recognizing the difference between these two perspectives, or better yet, how many even care about the difference.

I think people get around money and they lose their autonomy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't like the "personal shortcomings / circumstances beyond his control" choice
The first choice suggests simple incompetence, while the second suggests an honorable effort to do the right thing. I don't think either is accurate.

How about "Knowingly volunteered to be the front man for the wanton destruction of the federal government"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC