Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can state prosecutors indict Bush?-Consider the federal wire fraud statute...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:37 PM
Original message
Can state prosecutors indict Bush?-Consider the federal wire fraud statute...
Edited on Tue Jan-13-09 06:40 PM by kpete
A State Prosecutor for Bush?

Jonathan Zasloff speculates about the idea that an ambitious state attorney general might be able to find a way to indict Bush administration officials for crimes related to torture and so forth.
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/01/a_state_prosecutor_for_bush.php

...............

January 13, 2009
Can state prosecutors indict Bush?
Posted by Jonathan Zasloff

.......................

The answer generally is no -- but that is not for constitutional reasons. Rather, it arises because the criminal statutes in question vest absolute jurisdiction in federal prosecutors.

But not all federal criminal statutes. Consider the federal wire fraud statute, referred to as a "prosecutor's true love" because of its breadth:

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.


Nope: no jurisdictional limitation there. And for good reason: it's the oldest federal crime still on the books, and for much of the nation's history, it was routine for state prosecutors to indict for federal crimes.

I dunno: schemes to violate the law by torturing people, then lying and dissembling about it through electronic media? Maybe. The mail and wire fraud statutes are the most commonly used statutes to indict officials for public corruption.

more at:
http://www.samefacts.com/archives/corruption_in_washington_/2009/01/can_state_prosecutors_indict_bush.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. State AGs can prosecute crimes committed in their states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC