So Coulter got to be on the Today show TWICE today?

[underpants]

I read here that she was on with Lauer
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003927529

but I was at the gym and I could have sworn Coulter was back on in the fourth hour with Kathie Lee and Hota

Great she gets TWO segments on network "news"

This place is freakin' doomed. :eyes:

[KamaAina]

1. Actually the second one you saw was a Coultergeist

:P

[navarth]

2. they took the wires out of her jaw?

damn.

[Still Sensible]

3. Yeah, but they left

her head up her ass.

[luvspeas]

4. Don't worry

The only people that watch Kathy Lee and Hota are the poor folks who are unable to change the station the orderlies put on for them at 6am.

Let Coulter speak, she's like Palin, the more she opens her mouth, the farther she goes down the drain.

[AndyTiedye]

7. They Probably Lose a Few Patients That Way

[donco6]

5. As soon as I saw she was on, I switched to GMA.

I wonder if NBC realizes that I'm not alone . . .

[damntexdem]

6. On the Today Show! That's on TV, right?

Yeah, I know it is. But I have never watched it, no matter who is on it.

[Cheap_Trick]

8. So her crying and temper tantrum got her on NBC after all, eh?

There's so many things I'd like to call her, but any one of them would get me banned or this post deleted...so just use your imagination.

[underpants]

10. Apparently Lauer called her on HER manufacturing of the "barred from NBC" story

10 Minutes of her here
http://msnmember.my.msn.com/default.aspx

[Cheap_Trick]

14. That's 11 minutes more of her than I can stand.

But kudos to Matt for calling her on her bullshit.

[RamboLiberal]

9. She was originally scheduled to be on twice on Monday

when they bumped her. I wish I knew what the hell is the justification for any of these shows to book that **^%$^%.

[VA4Moran]

11. How?

Did we get so lucky?

[underpants]

12. Welcome to DU

:hi:

[underpants]

13. VIDEO here 9:50

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=256591&mesg_id=256591