Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Little Bomblet for Turdblossom in the New Rules (YES!!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 06:32 AM
Original message
The Little Bomblet for Turdblossom in the New Rules (YES!!)
<snip>
As he described earlier, John Conyers stuck something in the new rules that will allow the House Judiciary Committee to continue its lawsuit against Harriet Miers and Bolten to get their testimony in the US Attorney scandal.

One nice goody buried in the new House Rules package: the House will authorize the Judiciary Committee to continue its lawsuit seeking to enforce its subpoenas and contempt of Congress citations against Bush White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers.

Technically, Miers and Bolten were in contempt of the 110th Congress. But with its adjournment, the 110th Congress no longer exists, so there's nothing to be in contempt of, nor any plaintiff in the lawsuit. The courts had indicated that this might give them cause to moot the whole case and drop it. But the Rules package specifically authorizes the Judiciary Committee in the new 111th Congress to continue the suit. And we had earlier word that the 111th was considering reissuing those subpoenas.

There's one more juicy nugget in the rules package that just passed. Regarding the Judiciary Committe's power to continue its suit against Miers and Bolten.

From Majority Leader Steny Hoyer's fact sheet (PDF):

In addition, it authorizes the Judiciary Committee and General Counsel to add as a party to the lawsuit any individual subpoenaed by the Committee in the 110th Congress who failed to comply.

Who else was subpoenaed by the Judiciary Committee in the 110th Congress and failed to comply?

Karl Rove.

And Michael Mukasey.

Nice going, Chairman Conyers and Speaker Pelosi.

In other words, Rove--and Michael Mukasey, who refused to turn over documents particularly relating to the Siegelman prosecution--is about to get added to HJC's lawsuit forcing him to testify before HJC in the 111th Congress.
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/01/06/the-little-bomblet-for-turdblossom-in-the-new-rules/


Finally! Something to cheer about. Now if they will only USE this bomblet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doug.Goodall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Republicans are about to find out what it is like to not be the ruling party in Washington
Eight years of pay backs are in the pipeline, and on January 20 the dump valve will be opened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You have a good imagination.
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 06:52 AM by RC
I'll believe it when it when Miers and Rove are hauled in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. seeking to enforce its subpoenas and contempt
Great - but will Conyers et al exercise the power to enforce subpoenas/contempt charges?

If yesterday's opening of Congress is any indication - it's going to be more of the same crap, and the WHAAAAAAAmbulance is on stand-by ..."whaaa we don't have the votes...."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a joke...
Conyers, Pelosi & Reid are miserable failures, just like the chimp...

Great, we get to hear them whine about ignored subpoenas, and read their 'strongly worded letters', for two more fucking years... :eyes:

Fuck those spineless jellocrats...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rec #5
I'm thrilled with the sweet bomblet inclusion -- and just hope they exercise it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is good news, and I want to cheer, but not until I SEE SOME ACTION.
Until then, because of the Democratic Leaderships hideous, toadyinging, and frightened performance this past 8 years, really 28 years, I cannot get excited about that which, until some REAL ACTIONS shows otherwise, is likely another faux opposition ploy and that the Cowardly Congressional Democrats are as likely to go to the mat in forcing Bushie Henchmen to tesitify to their crimes as the German Social Democrats were likely to go to the mat in forcing Nazi Henchmen to tesitify to their crimes in 1933.

I wish I didn't have to think this way, but after observing the behavior of the Ruling Elite of both parties these last 8 and really 28 years, it is the height of foolishness to accept anything less than ACTION without high skepticism of a disgraceful track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Real Election Dividend...
Watching the rules debate yesterday was a guilty pleasure. It was a joy to see Drier and Pence and Boner all screaming about being shut out and knowing it was the case. The game in the House has changed...and soon the Senate will follow.

One interesting note of the subpoenas expiring with the end of the last Congress, it means there's nothing boooshie can pardon the three on...at least not pre-emptively. I wouldn't put it past the fukstick to now move on some kind of blanket pardon that will end up in the courts...thus stonewalling the day of reckoning a little longer, but I am confident that such a pardon won't stand up.

The noose is going to tighten around the Rover...he wove too many webs and one is sure to get him. If it isn't this matter, it will be the Siegelman case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That was the best session I've seen in the House
in some time. CSpan is showing a bit from Boehner right now on WJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Excellent
This is huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I would like to believe that it wouldn't be in there if it wasn't going to be used. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I hear you Thom, but that's what we thought when they ISSUED the subpoenas.
Call me moderately hopeful, but open to disappointment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yeehah!
And * won't be around to pardon their asses.

Go, Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC