Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Muslim family, US born citizens, removed from plane for discussing safest place to sit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 12:01 PM
Original message
Muslim family, US born citizens, removed from plane for discussing safest place to sit.
They were not allowed back on the plane after the issue was resolved, and they were not allowed to rebook their flight.

Muslim family booted off U.S. airline after comments

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Muslim family that was ordered off an AirTran Airways flight on New Year's Day said on Friday that they were told they could not reboard or rebook a flight on the discount airline even after security officials cleared them for travel.

Atif Irfan said in an interview with CNN that federal authorities removed him, seven family members and a friend from the flight after passengers overheard members of the group talking about the safest place to sit on the plane. He said they were being careful to avoid any "buzz" words like "bomb" that would trigger a security alert. The group was headed for a religious retreat in Florida when other passengers apparently overheard the conversation and reported it to authorities.

Irfan told The Washington Post he thought the group, all but one of them U.S.-born citizens, were profiled because of their appearance. He said five of the six adults in the group are of South Asian descent, and all six are traditionally Muslim in appearance, with the men wearing beards and the women in headscarves.

Irfan, 34, an anesthesiologist living in Alexandria, Virginia, said U.S. law enforcement officials treated the group with kindness but the family is upset that the airline did not allow the group to reboard the plane or rebook a flight after they had been cleared of any wrongdoing.


According to the article they booked a flight on US Airways after that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another depressing aspect of what the US has become... eom
Ignorance, arrogance, and paranoia--the legacy of the Bush* years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. A "legacy" that will probably stay.
Sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. the 'other passengers'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. The ugly American...
I feel sorry that we unleash these people on the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. One more reason not to fly.
I've always hated air travel, but the TSA bullshit and attitudes of airline people since 9/11 have made me hate it even more. If I can help it, I don't fly any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is bullshit. Complete, utter, embarrassing bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Flying While Brown
Jebus H. Flying Spaghetti Monster. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm torn on this story
When I fly, I dress in clothing without pockets, wear shoes that slip off easily, and make sure that I don't have any liquids over 3 oz. and that I'm carrying nothing sharp.

I know - intellectually - that most people who wear headscarves or even burkas are probably not dangerous. But on an emotional level, I worry they could have something tucked away in their scarves or garments. Then I start philosophizing about what kind of religion would require women to dress like this, and my ability to reason goes haywire.

Since I modify how I dress to go to airports and fly, why shouldn't I hold others to the same standard?

I expect a lot of people to jump down my throat for this, but I admit that I do worry about people covered up in lots of clothing. On the bright side, I also suspect canes and strollers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Because the standard you're holding people to is, as you admit, an emotional one.
And this is also ostensibly about what they said -- not what they were wearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. But it wasn't about what they were saying, really was it?
I read the story carefully to make sure. I remember flying in Europe in the late 1980s. I was flying Detroit to Frankfurt - the same route that the Lockerbie plane flew - and they grilled me at the airport. I didn't care. I also noticed that they pulled some women wearing burkas out of the line, and even though I'm sure they were perfectly fine women, I didn't care about that either. I would hope they'd also do the same for nuns and monks wearing traditional garb.

As I said, my response is purely emotional, but if I have to take off my shoes, wear minimal clothing, and be willing to put almost everything I have through the scanner, shouldn't people who wear headscarves have to take them off? You have to take off hats, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This story is not about problems clearing security
In any event, the TSA has specific screening procedures for head scarves . . .

http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/assistant/editorial_1037.shtm

Head Coverings
On August 4, 2007, TSA implemented revisions to its screening procedures for head coverings. TSA does not conduct ethnic or religious profiling, and employs multiple checks and balances to ensure profiling does not happen.

All members of the traveling public are permitted to wear head coverings (whether religious or not) through the security checkpoints. The new standard procedures subject all persons wearing head coverings to the possibility of additional security screening, which may include a pat-down search of the head covering. Individuals may be referred for additional screening if the security officer cannot reasonably determine that the head area is free of a detectable threat item. If the issue cannot be resolved through a pat-down search, the individual will be offered the opportunity to remove the head covering in a private screening area.

TSA's security procedures, including the procedures for screening head coverings, are designed to ensure the security of the traveling public. These procedures are part of TSA's multi-layered approach to security screening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Do they enforce this? Because I'm sure I've seen people
asked to remove hats.

I don't think they should have spied on the family and kept them off the plane, but I still think that religion shouldn't exempt you from removing extraneous clothing for security purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. This story has nothing at all to do with clearing security.
And everything to do with prejudice against brown-skinned people with beards and head scarves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. You obviously don't know the facts about this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
john444 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. good ideal
Lets all travel naked..........cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. People wear headscarves for religious reasons, and have you ever seen someone in a burka?
TSA scans everyone before they get on a plane so that you don't have to worry about people "hiding things in their garments."

I recommend that you seek therapy for your fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Predictably, some folks over at the freeker site
are calling for no Muslims on any planes. Of course none of them can afford a plane ticket, anyhow, so it's a moot point.

All the flights I have been on, in and out of MSP, have had obvious Muslims on them. We have millions of Muslims in this country. So far, since 9/11, none of them have done anything to a plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. I'm not sure that any Muslim person did anything to a plane on 9/11, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. This family is speaking out more. Says they were treated like 2nd class citizens.
" The families of Atif Irfan, a tax attorney, and his brother Kashif Irfan, an anesthesiologist, were removed from a flight before takeoff Thursday after a passenger reported hearing Atif Irfan's wife say something the passenger thought was suspicious. The airline declined to say what comment was overheard. But Atif Irfan say the couple was discussing the safest place to sit on a plane and speculates that someone misconstrued their intent."

..." "Really, at the end of the day, we're not out here looking for money. I'm an attorney. I know how the court system works. We're basically looking for someone to say ... 'We're apologizing for treating you as second-class citizens.' " he said.

"We are proud Americans," Sahin said. "You know we decided to have our children and raise them here. We can very easily go anywhere we want in the world, but you know we love it here and we're not going to go away, no matter what."

But Aziz, the Library of Congress attorney who also was removed from the plane, said there is a "very strong possibility" he will pursue a civil rights lawsuit.

"I guess it's just a situation of guilt by association," Aziz said. "They see one Muslim talking to another Muslim, and they automatically assume something wrong is going on."

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/01/02/family.grounded/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. The US still = a very racist country... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It's a hell of a lot better than it used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Just because the signs have been taken down
doesn't mean the hearts are open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. Brother was a Lawyer... I feel a lawsuit coming on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yep, don't blame them though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Not a bit... the company was completely whacked in this case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. this topped the news in Holland
according to my dutch friend. Great publicity :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Typical U.S. Profiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC