Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Obama most admired man. Bush second most admired. Huh?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:18 AM
Original message
Poll: Obama most admired man. Bush second most admired. Huh?
Edited on Fri Dec-26-08 11:21 AM by bushmeister0
AFP:

"President-elect Barack Obama has replaced US President George W. Bush as the most admired man in America.

One-third of the 1,008 respondents surveyed named Obama as their first or second choice, with Bush falling to a distant second after seven years as the country's most-admired man.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081226/pl_afp/uspoliticsobama

He's been America's most admired man for the past seven years? Where was I?

WTF does this all mean? What kind of Pravda happy news is this?

There's more:

"Among men, John McCain -- Obama's defeated Republican rival for the presidency -- ranked third and three others tied for fourth place: Pope Benedict XVI, the Reverend Billy Graham and former president Bill Clinton."

And get this, among the most admired women, Hillary is #1, followed by -- gasp -- Sarah Palin at 11%.

Condi Rice comes in fourth, followed by Michelle Obama and Oprah.

Condi Rice????????

WTF?

Are these the most admired people or the most well known?

I mean, wouldn't most people say their most admired man was their husband or father or something? You know?

And how does Bush come in second with five percent?

The mind boggles. I thought we were over this stupid shit. USA Today, obviously, didn't get the memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's the second most at 5%. Big deal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah but, who is his the second most admired man at five percent?
There's no one in between? There's 95 percent of the rest of us who do not admire him. Shouldn't that be the headline?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. A sample of 1,008?
Meaningless.

Ignore it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well, I think the Literary Digest predicting Alf Landon's victory or FDR in 1936
showed you don't have to poll every single person in the US to conduct an accurate poll.

As the U of Texas says:

"Statistical laws have established that no matter how large the population being studied (from a small city to a whole country), the size of the sample is the main factor that determines the expected range of error in a probability sample. Most current polls use samples ranging in size from 1,000 to 2,000 individuals."

I'm just saying . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. That final line in your quote
explains perfectly why polls are nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Easy to explain.
About half the voters were Republican and they are blind, deaf and dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No kidding. Did they only poll people at some megachurch in southern Virginia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is the Bush family large enough to get W 5% of the votes???
because I can't think of anyone else voting for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. What I like is that Angelina Jolie
came in tied for seventh with Laura Bush. I bet that pissed Jennifer Aniston off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. bushies are
virulent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC