Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A new wrinkle in money market fund implosions. Did you know

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 01:16 AM
Original message
A new wrinkle in money market fund implosions. Did you know
Edited on Thu Dec-25-08 01:17 AM by metapunditedgy
that your fund managers may withhold your own invested money to pay for their legal bills if you try to sue them for mis-managing your money?

The Bent family, which runs The Reserve, is being sued by investors and is also being investigated by the SEC. In response, The Reserve has said that they will hold on to a sizable chunk of investors' money to pay for their own legal fees. If investors sue The Reserve, they will have to pay for legal costs (and possibly punishments) on both sides!

The Reserve claims that this disgusting practice is allowed under Investment Company Acts and the funds' charters. I wouldn't be surprised if many other funds have this built-in "poison pill" to protect the fund managers from the consequences of their own corruption.


See, e.g., NYTimes via <http://www.rockymounttelegram.com/business/sec-staff-seeks-reserve-fund-inquiry-322443.html>

The Bents’ contract with the funds permit them to be indemnified for legal expenses under most circumstances, but both those contracts and federal mutual fund laws bar such compensation in cases of gross misconduct. Ms. DiMartino declined to say if the Bents would be able to tap the assets of the funds themselves to cover the expense of defending themselves in the S.E.C. case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder how many were told to *just* sign, the rest of the contract is just
"standard boilerplate", and not to worry their little heads about it.

The more that comes out about these hedge funds, the more I think we'll be seeing some riots soon, from the greedy investors trying to lay hands on the hedge fund managers that virtually stole the fillings out of the teeth of the investors.

Guillotine, anyone? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Gold plated pitchforks and designer torches
Pass me the gourmet popcorn, pleeeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Get your money out, then sue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. That was my first thought...
take your money out of the fund, then join the lawsuit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Won't work; they're refusing to give all the money back. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think maybe a Parisian gentleman may have fallen victim to such
anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. This was (marketed as) a money-market fund, not a "hedge" fund, FWIW.
At least with hedge funds, you expect your fund manager is doing borderline-legal stuff to make money.

But in this case, these guys are claiming that an ordinary money-market can hold on to your money and use it against you if you try to sue them for mis-using your money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Publish their home addresses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Even by the "standards" of US capitalism, that is totally surreal. Bare-faced robbery
sanctioned by the Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC