|
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 04:57 AM by RandomThoughts
Q: How would you explain the existence of policies that favor only a small percentage of the citizenry? If there were no power in money and lobbying efforts how do you explain all the money poured into the lobby industry? Are the corporations funding this largess stupid businessmen or altruists?
A: because many people allow money to make their decisions above what they might think is correct. Examples A TV executive could refuse to sell an add that is smear or deception. A teleprompter reader could refuse to read lies (in the rare case that they are given scripts that are geared to engineer public opinion.) Police could refuse to enforce actions that are violations of rights, or the constitution. Soldiers could refuse to deploy if they believe action unjust. Workers could refuse to do work for a company that acts unjustly. Financiers could refuse to do dishonest deals. Waitresses could refuse to serve people that have not shown an earning of their money. Shops could refuse to sell to people that have shown privileged actions. Workers could refuse to repair electric or roads to people that have shown privileged actions. People could refuse to pay taxes, if social contract was breeched People could stand outside buildings that advocate unjust actions and speak to others about it. People could refuse to ship goods to areas that have shown unjust actions. People could refuse to work for government officials that do not support just actions. Assistance to politicians could report the actions of those others, if they were unjust, to media. People could spend every hour of every day talking to others about what is important to them. People could refuse to vote for a candidate just because they are one of the two put on tv. People could go to jail, or refuse to hold others in custody due to breach of social contract.
and a thousand more things that could be done.
It is not that complicated.
Q:Thank you for considering my power so great that I am responsible for regressive taxation. I am humbled by your assessment, but that is not what I have suggested in the hundreds of letters I have written or the few LTTE that I have managed to get into print nor will it ever be likely to be the content of any of my future input. Why do you think it is my fault? Do you blame the poor as well as humble working class advocates for the poor such as myself?
A: I assign no blame, each person chooses their actions, it is definitely not for me to assign blame. However if a poor person shops at a store that actively advocates for keeping them poor, then they make a choice. This does sound radical, I know that, But the only reason power exist is people give it to others. They accept the system.
And if you stand long enough, and your actions are just, I believe a path will be shown, that is a belief system of mine, and does not need to be believed by others. It is what I believe however.
Also I do not say you should do more, I only say you could, as could I. The point is if people want to change the system it is up to them.
This is actually one of the arguments of the rich. They say if people did not want to be in wage slavery, or rule by the few, they would do something about it. They are happy as they are, and so they should continue to serve the few.
Personally, I am waiting for the changes that should occur under new administration. So this is acedemic thought on the issue. A way to present that the problem is not the few, but the choice of the many to allow the few to do as they wish.
|