Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ask Ford why in the hell we don't get the Ka!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:04 PM
Original message
Ask Ford why in the hell we don't get the Ka!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Ka



Did you know Ford has been making the Ka since 1996? It is widely distributed in Europe and Mexico, but not in the United States.

With a MPG in the mid to upper 40's (or higher for the 1.3L engine), Ford has not made this very economical car available to us. They get the bailout, we sure better get the Ka instead of more hummers and SUV's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Safety regs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My thoughts exactly.
I was excited to see that the smart car was coming to the US then after all the stuff they had to do for safety regs it barely gets better mileage than my Diesel VW. So my idea of driving around in a hyped up Golf Cart got scrapped, not because the idea wasn't cool just that with our safety regs our gas mileage blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. So how do Mini Coopers do in comparison? They are extremely popular
And the Ka looks as though it could compete with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. totally different market- mini-coopers are fairly high-end due to their pricetag.
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 04:20 PM by QuestionAll
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. I see a lot of Mini Coopers around here - didn't know they were high end!
What we need are American made versions of Tatas. They just reduced the price.



http://www.tatamotors.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
51. no thanks. i like cars with automobile tires.
that thing looks like a death trap.

mini-coopers are made by bmw, and start at $20k new for the base bare bones model...way more than a fiesta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. Mini-coopers brand new are around $19K. That's not "high end."
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. it's high end for a small car...people who would be looking for a cheap high-mileage car...
like a ka or a fiesta wouldn't be looking at mini-coopers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. I've read before that Mini dealers....
tend to increase the price above the manufacturer's recommended price. I guess they assume the people who like the Mini are willing to pay any price. So Minis probably can become high-end priced, especially after you add in extras. I think the Mini is cute but its probably not something I would end up buying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. seeing it is based on the Fiesta
and that had no safty issues I really kind of doubt that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. from greencar.com
This is on the "new" upgraded version just introduced.-

"It's possible that the Ka could be sold in the U.S. to meet a growing demand for small fuel-sipping cars. Ford already plans to bring the slightly larger Fiesta here in early 2010. If Ford does decide to bring the Ka to the U.S., it likely wouldn't arrive before 2010 or 2011 because of the modifications needed to meet U.S safety and emissions regulations and completion of requisite testing."

http://www.greencar.com/features/new-ford-ka-tdci-gets-56-mpg/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. are we just talking about emmissions?
or other items that would bring the weight up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Well, first the diesel that are sold in Europe generally are not EPA legal here.
Secondly, most upgrades that are required to pass crash testing and the like include beefing up the frame and bumper components. That usually increases weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. which lowers mpg...
for those that couldn't make the connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. they just changed the law on the diesel fuel in the usa
the new generation of engines and fuel can be used in the usa. it really depends on our refiners
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Since the switch over in fall 2006
I haven't seen 1 gas station that doesn't sell ultra-low sulfur diesel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
56. Time to revise the crash-testing laws here?
Granted, it would take a lot of number-crunching and engineering work to pore over the laws to figure out what rules can be loosened for the sake of reducing vehicle weight without compromising safety. I wouldn't trush any Bushies any further than I could throw them in that sort of endeavor, but the Obama administration so far is professional enough to handle it.

I can also see loosening the diesel engine laws slightly, to make them compatible with European diesel emission rules - if we standardized emissions with them, the auto manufacturers could make one type of engine that could be sold on both sides of the Atlantic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Profit margin? Up until recently they were selling enough SUV's.
Maybe we'll get it in a year or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. "It was confirmed in a radio interview with Ford Motor Company CEO Alan Mulally that the second
generation Ka may be introduced to the North American market to satisfy the high demand for smaller, more efficient cars, and to complement rising sales of the Ford Focus. Such a move would make the Ka Ford's smallest vehicle in North America, beneath the Fiesta.<7>"

(In 2009 the Ka will be replaced with a model car co-developed with Fiat S.p.A using the Fiat Panda platform. <2> <3> It will be produced in Tychy, Poland <4> with its Fiat sister, the Fiat 500.<6>)

From your link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The operative word is "may" - I hope we hold them to it as a condition of the bail out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. up until several months ago, almost nobody would have been interested in it...
and now with nobody buying anything- it's hard to say how it would actually sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I'll admit I did not even know about the Ka until a few months ago...
I drive a 1991 Honda CRX HF (two seater/45 MPG) with 240K on it and a rebuilt engine. I have no clue what a new Ka would cost and I'm not even in a financial position anytime soon to buy new. It's just if we are ALL going to become share holders of the Detroit BIG 3, I believe they should downsize and streamline to a production line which makes smart cars and more eco-friendly cars.

Someday...I'd love to at least have the option of buying one here. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I don't buy the idea that because the company is failing that we should make them sell
certain types of vehicles. I thought the whole point of a business was to provide what the market wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. How can you tell what the market wants when we are giving them billions of dollars....
...to tide them over? :shrug:

Without a bailout, would they not be forced to adjust to what the people really want?

Disclaimer: I'm neither pro or anti buyout, in truth I'm very mixed. Hate to see jobs lost, yet also hate to see rewarding a business for very poor decisions and mismanagement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. how well does the ford fiesta sell vs. other cars in their line would be one test...
if people are already taking a pass on their smallest car here- why would they introduce something smaller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. I wish more folks did prefer to go smaller...
Smaller = lots less CO2 emissions.

But like you said, people are taking a pass - unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
50. personally, i think that electric and bio-diesel hybrids are the way to go...
i think that a lot of people are waiting for the next generation, being alternative-fueled vehicles.

btw- do you know one big reason that toyota, gm, and others no loner have electric vehicles with NiMH batteries like gm's ev-1 and toyota's rav-4 ev had?

Whether or not Toyota wanted to continue production, it was unlikely to be able to do so, because the EV-95 battery was no longer available. Chevron had inherited control of the worldwide patent rights for the NiMH EV-95 battery when it merged with Texaco, which had purchased them from General Motors. Chevron's unit won a $30,000,000 settlement from Toyota and Panasonic, and the production line for the large NiMH batteries was closed down and dismantled. This case was settled in the ICC International Court of Arbitration, and not publicised due to a gag order placed on all parties involved.<1><2> Only smaller NiMH batteries, incapable of powering an electric vehicle or plugging in, are currently allowed by Chevron-Texaco.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_RAV4_EV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Toyota sells a lot of SUV's and trucks to go along with their 25k Prius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. I don't buy the idea that because the company is failing we should give them money
So if they want the money, they can do what we say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. you might try reading your own linked article...
It was confirmed in a radio interview with Ford Motor Company CEO Alan Mulally that the second generation Ka may be introduced to the North American market to satisfy the high demand for smaller, more efficient cars, and to complement rising sales of the Ford Focus. Such a move would make the Ka Ford's smallest vehicle in North America, beneath the Fiesta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I did, and I want "may" turned to "will" --- it's easy to say "may" with 14B on the table.
It should be in writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. just because it sells well abroad, it doesn't mean that it would do well here.
especially now that gas prices have cratered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. Exactly, it's the same with why VW hasn't brought the Polo to the US either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. here`s why 5 mph bumpers and dual air bags
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 04:35 PM by madrchsod
plus there`s not enough of a market to re- engineer the car

dam i`m spacing out today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Why on earth would I want to put myself in that, when I have a perfectly good 2008
Ford Focus that gets 36-40+ mpg? Or my 2008 Ford Taurus, which is even more comfortable and classy looking and gets 26+ mpg, and I can actually get two hockey bags in it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. or my 86 honda crx lol....
a lot of americans could`t fit in one of those euro boxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Shhh- most DUers won't admit that the Focus exists
Or that it's the best selling car in the world. American carmakers don't make cars people actually want to buy, don't you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
60. Oh SHIT! I keep forgetting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. The first words that came to mind when I saw that car were "deathtrap" and "rollerskate"
Followed by "it looks like a low rent Smart car, and I wouldn't buy one of those either."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Actually, those little smart cars do well in crash tests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Until they do crash tests versus oblivious drivers in ginat SUVs, I'm skeptical.
I suspect that, unlike a stationary object, they'd go up and over one of those little things.

Not that it matters, I need cargo space in my car, and actually use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. Hey, you makin' fun of my couch on wheels?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. I talked to a Ford dealer about this in October.
Ford plans to retool some of its truck, SUV and van plants to make the Fiesta and possibly the Ka. The money would have come from the $25 in the 2007 energy bill.

Ford also intends on bringing the new euro Focus here soon, possibly including a very snappy cabriolet.

Whether the Fiesta and Ka will sell well here with oil prices so low and consumers pulling back is anyone's guess. I think that Ford would have to underprice the Corolla and Civic to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. They already do with Mondeo... Corolla is just CHEAP
sorry but it is... especially those over the last 5 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. I thought that the Mondeo was the Contour/Mystique.
What is the Mondeo in the U.S.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #48
61. it is not in the US- Originally
Contour was the same... Mondeo became a sole designation years back.



Def. not a Contour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Looks nice! Maybe we'll get it back.
I love my Taurus, but next time around I'd be willing to try one of these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
32. Or the Mondeo... srsly it's better than a Camry...
and sexier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_and_proud Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. I love this video of a 70km Smart Car crash
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJHpUO-S0i8

Shows how well they are built
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. And my 5700 pound 1995 Dodge Ram 4x4 P/U would still
crush that piece of junk like an empty beer can and kill everyone in it without putting a scratch on the truck. I sold the truck early this year and traded in on a Dodge Charger R/T which gets twice the gas mileage but is still a very heavy and very safe car.

A few years ago, someone just merely rear ended me at a stopped light in their Honda Civic and it ripped the hell out of the front end and hood of that car and that was merely a 5 mph crash. Meanwhile the truck wasn't even scratched.

You can't sell cars like this in the US unless you are first going to confiscate every large POV in the US to protect the owners of these roller skates. You can't do that even if you give them a free rollerskate because there will be a huge political backlash against it.

By the way I saw some of these when I was in England in November and Textron and EZ Go make more substantial golf carts than these things and the vast majority of American males would simply not fit into one of these vehicles.

You can make cars which are comfortable AND safe AND fuel efficient. It's a false dichotomy to say that we have to choose.

One solution is electrics - another is methanol fuel cell. Even with conventional engines it should be possible to get 40MPG with good design and 6 speed transmissions.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlicerDicer- Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. Read up on how a smart was tag teamed by Semi's in Seattle
Get a clue please...

The Smart is well built and you get tag teamed by semi's in your shitty Dodge Ram you would be dead..

Yes this is flame bait but its true flame bait.

http://jalopnik.com/389911/smart-fortwo-punted-by-delivery-truck-returned-by-van

Weeeehaw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. Not half-bad!
Most conventional cars would have serious problems remaining that intact after smashing into concrete at 70MPH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
40. Oh the humanity!!!
When one of these roller skates gets caught up under someone's 4x4 truck or Hummer.

We need better fuel efficiency but that does NOT mean we should all be forced to drive rollerskates.

If I wanted to drive a motorcycle and put myself at that level of risk, I would drive a motorcycle.

A car this small is simply not safe enough at interstate speeds to be sold in this country.

We can easily get 40 MPG WITHOUT driving roller skates.

I own a 1995 Z28 Camaro convertible with a 6 speed manual and a 5.7L V8 and I can get 32 MPG out of it on the interstate at 65MPH and 6th gear in cruise control. If I can do this with a 13 year old car (and convertible at that) we can certainly do 40MPG without resorting to roller skates.

Former owner of an 1982 VW Rabbit...

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Nobody is forcing you...
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 05:48 PM by RiverStone
I'm advocating for the choice, nothing more.

BTW, see post #39 for how well the smart car does in crash tests.

On edit: Of course, this is not a Ka crash test and I'm not sure if it is representative, but it is good to see such a tiny car do so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Yeah but your choice to drive a roller skate drives up MY insurance
because if I kill one in their roller skate or injure them, I'll end up paying more because they were driving an unsafe subpar car.

You CAN have a safe car, a comfortable car, and a fuel efficient car without having to buy more than one car to do it.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Driving too fast, too drunk, or while talking on the cell also...
...drives up insurance.

As all also cause wrecks, though I can't tell ya in what percentage without doing more research.

Going back to the OP, if not the Ka --- then what type of re-tooling, re-marketing, or re-production would you demand of the BIG 3 before we all become shareholders in an arrogantly mismanaged business that is asking for a 14-15 billion dollar bailout?

They sure as hell better do something different!?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. You make it sound as if your driving habits would be the reason for the death of another
than any perceived unsafe standards in the design of smaller cars. Just because your truck (or whatever massive vehicle it is you're driving that weighs in at 5700 pounds) seems to have a diamond coating and a neutronium body such that it never gets a scratch from run-ins with smaller cars, doesn't mean that smaller cars are inherently unsafe. It only means that we don't have a standard when it comes to bumper heights (like they do in Europe) and that existing traffic laws are not as heavily enforced so that there are fewer accidents.

Personally, I would rather force everyone out of our current vehicles and into robotcars, negating the need for insurance, traffic lights, traffic cops, and the need to pay attention to driving the road when you'd rather be txting on your cell or watching last night's tivo-ed ballgame on your popup DVD-player ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. How long did it take to get the Yaris here? Or...
the Fit or Versa?

And how many of them are they selling? Even when gas cost twice as much as it does now?

As was said, or hinted, upthread, it would cost hundreds of millions to redo the thing to make it legal to sell here and just how and when are they to get that money back?

Just for shits and giggles, say it's only 50 million development cost to get it over here (lowball). At $1,000 a car profit (high?) that's 50,000 Kas before they break even. So, let's get back to the how many Fits and Versas are selling...

Gambling as much as billions on car design just because you or I think it's a neat idea does not get them out of the hole.

(Does VW still make the original Beetle in Mexico-- that's not allowed here either)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
43. Honestly you don't want it
That car (at least in 2001) had the worst suspension EVER. We crossed the Italian Alps with 3 people in it, and by the time we hit the valley after Cortina I thought we all were going to spew! IIRC there are several other models made by Ford that get good gas mileage and are a step above the KaKa (as we call it).

In Europe, Ford still offers the Fiesta: http://www.ford.co.uk/ns7/fiestab299/-/-/-/-/-/-

A new KA is coming soon, hopefully this will have better suspension!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. Wow some people really do believe the big is better myth
If the car has no crumple zone - the driver and passenger crumples instead. The shock of an impact at high speed (and high in reality does mean anything over 30 MPH even though it does not feel like it) has to go somewhere. This is why ALLL Euro cars are designed with low impact crumple zones. Your truck may be as strong as anything and appear solid. I however would prefer legs.

As for people thinking American car safety standards are more stringent than those in the EU, I laughed my head off. HAve a look at NCAP standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakefrep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
58. Our government is a bigger roadblock to this car than anybody in Ford's boardroom.
It isn't cost-effective to bring this car up to US specs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
62. I like the Fiesta better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC