Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald couldn't get an indictment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:01 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald couldn't get an indictment?
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 08:58 PM by Timefortruth
Why did Fitzgerald use a criminal complaint to arrest Blagojevich rather than an indictment?

Yeah, I know it is heresy to suggest that Fitzgerald is anything less that Clark Kent, and it naturally follows that Blagojevich is Darth Vader (excuse the mixed metaphor), but the group think on this issue is out of hand.

It is possible that Blagojevich is a bad actor AND Fitzgerald couldn't nail him within the process, so Fitz chose to abuse the system? Don't we need the good guys to play by the rules too? If they don't, aren't we all at risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is a criminal complaint "less than" an indictment?
Why would a criminal indictment put us all at risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. An indictment requires a grand jury
The prosecutor must present evidence that there is probable cause a crime has been committed, if convinced, the grand jury indicts. The joke is that the standard is so low the prosecution can normally get an indictment of a ham sandwich. However, if there is no there there, grand juries occasionally don't issue the indictment. It is a check against prosecutorial abuses. Not much of a check, but it was required in the Constitution for a reason. Normally, it helps the government because they can use the grand jury as a means to issue subpoenas as well.

There is something amiss in this story. It reminds me of the Spitzer fiasco. The guy is guilty, but the targeting is suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. And because he still needs to either get an indictment or
the Court needs to hold a preliminary hearing within 20 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. he certainly has more guts going after Blago
than he showed avoiding Dick Cheney's shadow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Blag was indicted. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No, he wasn't. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. "MR. FITZGERALD: First of all, there's not an indictment, I realize. It's a complaint. So I don't
want people to understand it's an indictment. We've filed a criminal complaint. And I'm not going to get into where things stand, in the Senate seat, other than that we've -- there's an ugly episode that we've aired.

We've brought charges. We'll proceed. And the public discourse will go its way without our guidance."

Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/12/fitzgerald_press_conference_on.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. So?
What does that explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. So what! I merely gave Fitzgerald's press release. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. Thank you.
But how does it answer my original question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. I replied to #3, not to your original question to which I have no answer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. i never thought Fitzgerald was all that but i didn't need him to know that Blago is corrupt
you might have a point. but i'm not going to defend Blago .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's just it
Blagojevich was an easy mark, why the rush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Time
He was trying to prevent Blag from advancing his scheme, and Blag indicated on the tapes he would appoint someone before Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Plenty of time for an indictment.
I bet you a dollar there is a grand jury out there that refused to indict.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. No. If there were a grand jury seated and hearing this case the media
would've covered it. There's no way he could've, or would've, kept that secret. Everyone knew when Ryan's grand jury was convened.

I think it was a matter of timing. He wanted Blago stopped before he named a Senator. Fitz also mentioned in his presser that the grant to Children's Memorial was "sitting on the governor's desk". He wanted the arrest before Blago could kill that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Bullshit. Grand juries convene secretly all
the time. Quite successfully, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I don't know where you live, but that would not have happened in Chicago. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
45. I Can Tell You
From personal experience that Grand Juries can work in secret even in C(r)ook County in the great state of Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
53. Nothing seems strange to me. Fitzgerald has been investigating
Gov B for a few years and the slower pace for the main guy didn't surprise me either. He went through 60 Ryan associates before he got Gov Ryan, he builds up and tries to get the wider network too.

I'm sure the larger investigation continues and many of the charges on the affidavit could have been succesfully taken to a grand jury...but they learned Blagojevich was racing to fund-raise $2.5 million from those with big state contracts...because new state ethics law would curtail the ability to fund raise with that group. Hearing of his (corrupt) plans and actions they got the wiretap started in late October and that is when they learned of the Senate seat scheming.

That changed everything. They were picking up many other Pay to Plat schemes through the taps and his His normal way would be to keep gathering evidence, let the crime unfold...but Obama already resigned his seat and I think Fitz was right that this had to be stopped before it happened, before someone was named to replace him or problems would be compounded.

So he went affidavit for the sake of immediacy. The Senate things could still be defended by swearing it was all big talk, he hadn't done or demanded anything, depending on other evidence he has or gets maybe he won't be charged with them but making it public sure put a stop to it. I think he made the right choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. He needed to head off whatever else was coming down the pike, pronto.
This mess is going to require alot of time to untangle. So many people involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That's my guess. In fact, Fitz was pretty clear about that in the press conference. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. There may be something not even hinted at in the complaint that he wanted to forestall.
Too early to know what the hell is going on right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
60. I think so too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I'll take your bet for more than a dollar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
56. But now Blagojevich is radioactive...
...while Fitz tries for that indictment. It's much less likely that he can make the sale.

Sounds good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you were to
venture a guess on the best reason he had, what might it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Fitzgerald couldn't convince a grand jury
Either he tried and failed, or knew it wasn't worth the risk.

There are major inconsistencies in Fitzgerald's story if you think about it, most importantly regarding Jackson Jr.'s culpability. If JJ Jr. didn't make the offer, there was no possibility that Blagojevich was influenced by the possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. While I know
that you are saying that you think this, I had asked if you could do a simple exercise. Rather than identify what you believe are the bad reasons, can you identify the best reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Since I've already questioned St. Fitzgerald,
I'm on very thin ice, so it might be best to simply ask the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Actually,
it is good to question everything. No matter if a person likes or dislikes Mr. Fitzgerald -- or is somewhere in between -- questioning is an important part of rational thinking and is essential for democracy. I'm not attempting to say that you shouldn't question this -- just the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Yeah, the subject is touchy
There is a blind adoration of Fitzgerald, so it's easy to become defensive. My apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. No problem at all.
I do respect Mr. Fitzgerald .... enough so, that there are things I disagree with him on.

In this case, I suspect -- and this is nothing more than speculation on my part -- that he did so due to time. He can still bring this to a grand jury, though he does not have to. I think that, based upon his past record, there is a good chance that he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. It is just his record that bothers me
He didn't do all that hot a job on the Wilson prosecution. No King Fish were caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Scooter Libby
was the third most powerful person in the administration. I'd add that we do not know if he asked the grand jury to return an indictment against VP Cheney or not. We do know that he signaled for Congress to investigate Cheney's role. Many things that are not outright crimes are still abuses of the power of office, and as Nixon found out, are grounds for impeachment.

I do wish that Cheney had been charged, no matter the potential outcome in criminal court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. How does Scooter become third?
You are right that we don't know the whole story, but what we do know is fairly damning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. What three positions
did Libby hold?

To convict Cheney in criminal court, it would have been important to have Libby's cooperation. Otherwise, Cheney's attorneys could have argued that there was reasonable doubt regarding if he actually encouraged Libby to mention Plame. Considering how the jury in the Libby trial spoke after they delivered their verdict, it is fair to say that the average person on a jury of this sort viewed things differently than those who had studied the case more carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. How was Scooter the third most
powerful administration official?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. What three positions
did he hold in the administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. You said, " Scooter Libby was the third most powerful
person in the administration."

How did you arrive at that conclusion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Do you know
the three job titles that he held in the administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. No I don't know the three titles he had, just tell us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. He was Cheney's COC at the time he
was indicted, but I'm not sure that made him the third most powerful man in the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I don't get it either.
Third most powerful man won't have been one of their fall guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. He wasn't a "fall guy."
Libby held three positions at once in the White House: he was VP Cheney's chief of staff; Cheney's national security adviser; and an assistant to President Bush. No one person has ever had that amount, nor range, of power in a White House before (except obviously presidents). To better appreciate how and why Cheney and Libby set this unique circumstance in motion, I'd recommend "Angler," by Barton Gellman.

In essence, Dick Cheney and Scooter Libby had access to every single paper that would cross Bush's desk, before the president saw it. More, they had the ability to edit and remove information. Unheard of.

Libby, as we know from sources ranging from Wilson to Newsweek to Corn & Isikoff, had the ability to go to CIA headquarters -- by himself, with Cheney, or with un-elected Newt Gingrich -- and to pressure senior analysts to change their reports. No one else in the White House (except Cheney) could do this.

Along with Cheney, Libby ran the OVP's own neoconservative "intel agency," which brought about: (a) the Plame scandal; and (b) the Franklin/AIPAC espionage scandal. Keep in mind that under AG Ashcroft, the Plame investigation was being dragged out. It wasn't until James Comey appointed Patrick Fitzgerald that anything substantial happened. This was because veteran FBI investigator Jack Eckenrode suggested prosecuting Libby for lying to investigators, then pressuring him to avoid a long prison sentence, by testifying what Cheney's role had been. This was going as planned, until President Bush commuted Libby's prison sentence.

Despite the fact that a neoconservative who worked for the OVP intel operation has pleaded guilty to engaging in espionage, and two AIPAC operatives (one with a history in the intelligence community, including CIA security clearance), in a case where military intelligence involving Iran was shared with a third country, our media ignores the scandal. The two (ex-)AIPAC officials have been able to delay their trial, using "grey-mail," for over four years. That trial threatens to expose Condi Rice's role in the scandal.

Although Libby was not in the public spotlight in the manner of a Karl Rove, one could not make a serious case that Rove had the background or ability to do the things that Libby did. As Joe Wilson noted in his book, Libby actually tasked Rove with assignments. The guy had an unwarrented amount of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Then why wasn't Rove the fall guy?
Was he being protected by Chimpy, you'd think Snarly would have thrown Rove under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Because Rove's access
to Plame's identity was through Libby. He did not have access to it otherwise. It is worth going back to Wilson's book, however, to review that Rove became furious with Cheney and Libby when he was informed that he may have violated a federal law by completing the task he was assigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Thanks for clearing it up for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. they thought that Blago was going to make his announcement yesterday re: Obama's replacement...
and fitz decided that that COULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Because they were concerned that Blago was about to make his appointment,
and did not want him to taint a United States Senate seat. An indictment would have required more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fitzgerald wanted to stop crimes in progress
The government now has 20 days to either hold a preliminary hearing on the case or bring an indictment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. All these reasons may be valid, but
we very much need to have that Senate vacancy filled by the time the new Congress convenes.
Preferably by a Democrat. Some of the alternate ways might work out OK, but... as I understand it, the Lt. Gov. can't take office till Blago resigns or is removed, and how long will it take the Legislature to change the rules for filling a vacancy like this? Timeliness is important too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. I heard this argument today on this point...
All Fitz was really trying to do was derail a horrible political crime.

Not sure if it has merit but that's what I heard from a guy who knows a guy who used to live in Chicago but is not really an informed source :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. And Jackson would have been
a horrible outcome?

There is a missing piece here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. my guess is that the grand jury route takes longer
and time is of the essence when a senate appointment could happen at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. the guy has been under investigation all this time, and no indictment?
sorry, i think blaggo is a nut, and a crappy governor, but if they had the goods, they would have brought them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Again we hear from the 13%. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. the 13%
who believe in the rule of law and the sanctity of elections. sure, throw that shit against the wall, see if it sticks. slime the whole democratic party of illinois. sure, why not. maybe we can get a gropenator of our very own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. How did I slime the whole Democratic Party of Illinois?
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 09:07 PM by mycritters2
Even before yesterday, Blago had a 13% approval rating. There are a lot more Dems in Illinois than that. Even most Dems could see what he is. 13% of the state could not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. back to ignore with you.
ok, you didn't slime the whole party, just all those north of rt 80, and east of rt 39.
plonk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I slimed the 13%. That's you, and what 4 other people? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. Time. According to what I heard yesterday on news Fitz was going to wait until Spring but then the
senate seat situation came up so he decided it was best to act now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
50. Fitzgerald will be able to get the indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
55. I don't know exactly how it works at the Federal level,
but on the State level in Illinois more often than not indictment comes after the arrest unless the prosecutor needs a Grand Jury to issue investigative warrants etc. Fitzgerald didn't need a Grand Jury to investigate Blagovich's dealings and he wanted to get his charges out in the ether before Blago made an appointment that would certainly have been tainted once this all became public. The charges will be brought before a Grand Jury in due time and I have no doubt an indictment will be handed down.

If Fitzgerald had put his charges in front of a Grand Jury and failed to get a True Bill, that would be a matter of public record and you can bet your bottom dollar that we would have heard about it by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
57. Give It Time...Fitz Needs To Go To The Grand Jury
Sorry...no free passes for Blago.

This crime spree was called to his attention about 3 weeks ago and the FBI rushed in to get the goods. The urgency of stopping Blago before he sold one of my Senate seats was why they moved so quick...and only came up with a complaint with one charge. It's sure not gonna stay that way.

I expect Fitz will go to the Grand Jury, if he hasn't already...THEY'RE the ones who issue in indictment...not Fitz. Stay tuned, Blago will be in court more often than Judge Judy in the weeks and months ahead. We should see a multi-count indictment with plenty of stuff to nail him on.

Sorry, no abuse of system...keep trying to paint this pig a different color, it smells and there's still a pig....and his name is Blagojevich.

Blago will have his day in court...and if he is convicted it won't be because of Fitz, but Blago's own greed, arrogance and stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
59. Blagojevich- the political equalivilent of Tony Soprano
Good luck to to Fitzgerald with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
64. Fitz the Putz is a Repuke operator
The Libby situation was an exercise in damage control. The crimes should have led to the indictment, impeachment and imprisonment of both Cheney and Bush. Fitz dragged it out and got only Libby (who is about to be pardoned).

Here he hurried the case. IMO, to prevent the little people from getting too uppity. You know, they might have started feeling empowered after Blag's intervention against Bank of America. Nobody stands up to the banksters.


Republicanists = economic terrorists. They hate the American way of life. They hate the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC