Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The U.S. Attorney Document Gap (emails from mid-Nov-Dec missing)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:11 PM
Original message
The U.S. Attorney Document Gap (emails from mid-Nov-Dec missing)
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 09:15 PM by RedEarth
The U.S. Attorney document gap.“In DOJ documents that were publicly posted by the House Judiciary Committee, there is a gap from mid-November to early December in e-mails and other memos, which was a critical period as the White House and Justice Department reviewed, then approved, which U.S. attorneys would be fired while also developing a political

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/20/the-us-attorney-document-gap/

....shades of Nixon...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Surprise, surprise...
Could they be any more in-your-face with their corruption? It's as though they're PROUD of their deceptiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is the equivalent of the 18 minute gap
Remember the gap in the Nixon tapes. There is no questions that those emails are absolutely damning and will never willingly see the light of day. This thing really calls for a Special Prosecutor with full subpoena power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I guess Harriet is being prepped for her fall on this one.
"Accidental shredding".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is this what Leahy was referring to?
Did he know something? Or was he just speculating based on prior experience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Also, intra-WH emails were not included
which could also be what Leahy was talking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thanks
I didn't hear that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The Dems know more than they are letting on. When Hillary called for
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 09:28 PM by John Q. Citizen
Gonzales to resign last week I knew she knew something more than was already out there.

There is also stuff that's been leaked to Dems from inside the DOJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You're right.
The DOJ is certainly talking to someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nixon had tapeworms nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's not forget Gonzales' 12-hour gap from the Plame investigation
For some reason, hearing the story about these missing emails reminds me of Gonzales' 12 hour gap.

Remember when Gonzales was White House Counsel, and he was officially informed by the Department of Justice that it was investigating the leak of Valerie Plame's name. And Gonzales waited 12 hours to inform White House staff that they had to preserve all documents in the Plame case. That's what I just thought about after reading this thread.

Plame case----waiting 12 hours to tell WH staff to preserve documents

Attorney purge case-----documents (emails) missing.


Hmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think this is going to make Nixon look like a lightweight when it's done.
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 09:50 PM by roamer65
The Dems know something is there, that's why they're coming on like gangbusters. DOJ must be leaking like a sieve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Very critical gap, imo
The very fact there were no e-mails released during that timeframe raises a whole host of red flags. There must be some very damning material being protected and I have no doubt the House and Senate Committees will be focusing on getting the missing material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Kick. It's pretty incredible that the WH believes no one would notice??!!
That's just really bizarre. Or more suspiciously, those docs need more white-out before it's "accidentally" discovered they weren't sent over. Oops, so sorry, my bad, HERE they are (now that we've had 24, 36, 48 more hours to comb over their content and erase it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Flashback: White House e-mails that could implicate Rove missing in CIA Leak case (flashback)
Emails related to Rove always disappear. Why?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11150000/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC