Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel Asks How Inquiry Began on Spitzer Banking.......were THEY out to get him???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:51 AM
Original message
Panel Asks How Inquiry Began on Spitzer Banking.......were THEY out to get him???
Edited on Wed Nov-26-08 08:52 AM by a kennedy
By DANNY HAKIM

ALBANY — Eight months after a federal investigation into a prostitution ring brought about the downfall of Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the question persists in some circles: Was the federal government out to get Mr. Spitzer?

No evidence has surfaced to support such an assertion, and the prosecutor in the case has said that politics played no role in the pursuit of Mr. Spitzer, a Democrat. But that has not put to rest suspicions, expressed on left wing blogs, that Mr. Spitzer, a zealous pursuer of Wall Street wrongdoing who some thought could one day be president, had been singled out.

Now, a congressional committee is pursuing what would be the first public examination of the events that prompted the initial inquiry into his bank transactions, which showed he was sending money to a front company for Emperor’s Club V.I.P.

The House Financial Services Committee intends to take up the matter early next year and tentatively plans to hold hearings that could include testimony from the United States Treasury’s law enforcement unit, along with Mr. Spitzer’s bank, North Fork, and HSBC, a bank used by a company connected to the prostitution service.

full article: <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/nyregion/26spitzer.html?_r=1&hp>

edit for paragraph limit.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. It was his own fault.
If he hadn't been fucking around on his wife with a whore, there would have been nothing for them to get him on. Fuck Spitzer that disgusting piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. now that's said.. it is a crime to investigate someone with no evidence of a crime..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Learn from the last eight years. Don't defend the corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Corrupt how? he was screwing someone, how does having sex
equal corruption?

your repuke is showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It is corrupt to take an oath
to up hold the law and then break the law. Just like it is corrupt to uphold the constitution and then disregard it. Being that you don't know me. I wouldn't toss around any of your repuke crap either. Learn from the history otherwise you end up repeating it. I don't know about you but just because there is a D after someone's name doesn't mean I am going to defend them. I want to keep a Dem Majority for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. meh, got me there. I admit it. :)
peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Spitzer is guilty, yes. And if he was busted by corrupt means,
...then that corruption must also be dealt with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Correct ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. well said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC