Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was the $700 billion dollars a loan or a gift??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:28 PM
Original message
Was the $700 billion dollars a loan or a gift??
Or what was it? We know that Paulson and Bernanke told the Congress that our entire banking system could collapse if they didn't get the money immediately. Congress gave them the money with the understanding that it would be used to cover all the "bad assets", which was the reason the banks were in trouble. Then, less than 2 weeks later, Paulson advises the same Congress that they have spent $290 billion dollars of that money in buying up other banks and making the banks more stable, rather than buying up any of the "bad assets"?? Say what!!

But the question is: Was this money a loan or a gift? What do we get in return? Do we own $290 billion of stock in these banks?? Does anyone know the answer??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. part robbery, part snake oil con job
if the same ol management teams are at the helms of the bailed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gift or loan...um seems more like extortion if you ask me
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. That money was a gift, it is long gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. The stock is an investment
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 08:10 PM by depakid
whether they turn out to be profitable investments remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. An investment in what ??
Do we own stocks in the banks? Or do we just get the satisfaction of knowing they can continue to screw us with 29% interest rates on their credit cards??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. It's an equity stake that can be sold down the line
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 07:53 PM by depakid
Would have been better if we'd acquired voting rights with our equity interests (as Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling and the British have done).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. We Own Non-Voting Shares
Purchased at twice the price they should have been purchased at. Depending on how things shake out, it could end up being a loan, a gift, or some of both. Mostly a gift, is my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. very surreal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ransom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. guy with a gun approaches you on the street and demands your money...
is it a gift or a loan??

i do believe you have left out the third, and obvious, choice: robbery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. OT....
I just have to say what a beautiful Springer you have there! :loveya:

We had our girl 14 years and had to put her down 2 months ago. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Most of us here..
... knew this was a scam from the start. $700 billion isn't remotely enough to fix this problem, and it's really pointless for the treasury to try.

The banks that are insolvent need to just be allowed to fail, and THEN the govt can step in and do whatever has to be done to make it possible for the banks that weren't stupid enough to fall into this trap to function.

As it is, Paulson, from Goldman Sachs, is just trying to help his pals in the investment banking business, not rank and file americans.

I hope Obama's treasury man is more interested in what's best for all americans, but I'm not holding my breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. And my bet is ....
that they will figure out a way to get the other $350 billion before Obama is sworn into office. Wanna bet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fraud, Robbery, Ransom, Blackmail-you name it.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. The law deals harshly with man or woman.
Who steals a goose from off the common
But, lets the greater felon loose
Who steals the common from the goose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. And something that doesn't make sense to me...
is how some folks are so opposed to the proposed $25 billion for the Big Three bailout but never raised a whisper about the $150 billion that went to AIG? Or the billions that went to Goldman Sachs or the other Big Banks? Why do you think that is?

Given that they were all responsible for the condition in which they found themselves, would AIG be more important to our overall economy than the Big Three?? Given that none of them are "deserving" of a bailout, if you had to choose between AIG and GM, which would you choose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. it was a con... a grift... a heist
at least as far as I can see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. gift - kiss it goodbye like the rest of the money wasted by bfee n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. And now there's talk of "diverting" a part of that to the Auto companies
I thought the $700 billion was ALL for "saving the economy" - and that it was just SOME of the money needed.

You've all been scammed. There's no other explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzYvonne Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Theft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kinda' like credit card theft on a grand scale perpetrated by the politicians.
With more to come...for our own good, donchya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. Shouldn't we be asking that of
our representatives that wrote, read, understood and then voted for and signed the piece of crap legislation on the first place? Who were those fools. If they now claim that it's not what they intended, then they deserve to be recalled and impeached. No one gets a free ride on this mess.

Of course that may be just a bit uncomfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC