Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Any Major Civil Rights Advance Ever Been Achieved by Winning Over Hardcore Bigots?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:46 PM
Original message
Has Any Major Civil Rights Advance Ever Been Achieved by Winning Over Hardcore Bigots?
I can't think of an instance.

From Gandhi to Rosa Parks to Women's Suffrage, a small base of reasonable people were won over, and then the advance was achieved through the hands of a few.

Am I just not thinking of instances in which a long slog of outreach won the day?

Or is there a only a critical mass that needs to be reached before change can be enacted by law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. You are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure what you mean.
Edited on Tue Nov-11-08 11:53 PM by Radical Activist
There will always be racists but a large number of Americans changed their attitudes in a relatively short period of time. We went from not letting black people drink at the same water fountain as whites to electing a black President in the passing of one generation. That's relatively quick in the bigger picture. My baby boomer mother remembers restaurants that would only serve black people at the back door and that was in the north. Now she sees Obama in the White House. So yes, I'd say hard core racists have been won over or at least socially shamed over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm thinking of Proposition 8. And I can't think of another movement that achieved
its goals by popular vote.

Most have won over the most reasonable people, just enough to make feasible an a Supreme Court case, let's say, without converting enough to win a popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Now I see your point.
Well, I think we have to remember that segregation didn't just naturally happen. It was imposed by the powerful on white people too, many of whom never liked it, or simply accepted what they were raised with. I don't think the 1964 civil rights act would have won a popular vote in most southern states but there are places in America where it would have won. Things can change rapidly.

But yeah, a minority getting their rights from the majority never happens easily. The power of what people like Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King did was that it made "moderate" whites wake up to just how wrong segregation was. It forced them to confront the evil they turned a blind eye to. You won't win over the hard core bigots right away but you can win over a majority. Fuck the rest. Their kids will know better even if they never do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The amendment granting women the right to vote
had to be approved by 2/3 of the state legislatures in the country. That's the closest example in the US that I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Even then the hardcore bigots were never really won over
Mississippi didn't ratify it until 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Some never will be.
But they don't all need to be for rights to be protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lumpsum Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Civil rights can't be simply left up to a popular vote.
Only the supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. good question, one i never thought about but
makes me consider why I don't buy this blame the victim thing, which you have brought up , where they are blaming the "no on 8" people for inadequate outreach. the people doing the blaming are pretty NASTY about it , too, which gives me pause. TOO much virulence towards us, the victims . they way they act you would think people we have to supposedly "outreach to" where the victims and we were the bad guys who had to explain ourselves. it just seems off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I was thinking, no one ever blamed Rosa Parks for not doing enough outreach to
convince racists to segregate.

At some point you have to know you've gotten through to the reasonable people, and beyond that you're just kissing the ass of bullies and bigots to get some crumbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. It should never have come up as a voting issue.
I hope this gets resolved soon. Our state got gamed. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. I would say that if you look at the black civil rights movement between 1940 and 1970...
what you have isn't so much an outreach to hardcore bigots as you have a gradual realignment of people who previously didn't really care too much. While some people were still hardcore bigots as late as 1970 and remain so to this day, they lost the approval of those around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nope, in our country it has always had to be forced on people by the courts
and the legislators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. Nope -- it's a good think MLK didn't take advice from some of the bigot-coddlers on this board.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. correct. you change people's *inner selves* by changing society - not the opposite.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 01:00 AM by Hannah Bell
contrary to what most folks seem to think.

bigotry is created through law, economics & media, & is taken down the same way. The old folks die out, & young people grow up in a different world with different ideas.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zuul9 Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think it can be overturned by popular vote in CA
It would be really difficult to overturn via the CA supreme court this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC