Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We Elected A Centrist President" Is It Centrist To Support FISA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 01:48 PM
Original message
Poll question: "We Elected A Centrist President" Is It Centrist To Support FISA?
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 02:26 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Feel free to suggest what right wing Bush policies you expect to see
rolled back WITHOUT complaint from so-called "centrists" on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm confused. FISA's been around for awhile.
So does "supporting FISA" mean FISA before Bush, or Bush's bastardization of FISA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The latter, mostly.
There were problems with FISA before, such as the "roving wiretaps" clause being used to track non-suspects conversations in criminal cases, but those were not the problems Bush was trying to solve. The problems Bush and the Bush-centrists saw with FISA was that it didn't allow enough warrantless wiretapping to make the generric spying on all Americans legal. And since Bush I kicked off the project to make it possible to track all communications, clearly the 4th Amendment was outdated, just like some on the left think the 2nd and 3rd are outdated.

(Interestingly, we violated the 3rd Amendment in Iraq and nobody said anything, so I guess it's still needed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I was unaware that Constitutional rights extended to Iraqis in Iraq living under Iraqi law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I thought the purpose of the Iraq war is to extend American freedoms to Iraq.
What other justification can there be for supposedly centrist folks not wanting us to leave immediately because of the immorality of it all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't think you'll find anyone who believes
that the purpose of the Iraq war is to extend the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution to Iraqis living in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Don't you think the Bill of Rights are inalienable & include rights anyone should have?
Such as the right not to have American soldiers quartered in their house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. If you're going to talk about universal rights,
then I would phrase the third amendment as such: "Persons have the right to refuse their government the right to quarter soldiers in their house during peacetime, and have the right to legal protection when their government must quarter soldiers in their house during wartime."

The Iraqi government of course has violated this, but if we want to talk about universal rights that the Iraqi government isn't exactly championing, then we have bigger fish to fry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yep, I like to talk about them. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. FISA has been around for decades, so I would think so, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So you wouldn't support an attack on warrantless wiretapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Depends on what we're talking about.
If we're talking about adding transparency guidelines and increasing internal checks to prevent abuses of power, then yes, I think that could be considered centrist. If we're talking about completely destroying the entire concept of FISA, then no, I do not think that is reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You don't think it's reasonable not to have warrantless wiretapping of all communications?
What issues DO you think a progressive should focus on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I never said I approved of wiretapping all communications. Not sure where you got that.
The original charter of FISA, after all, allows warrantless wiretaps only so long as there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication involving an American citizen or lawful resident. While this is open to abuses, I think that strengthening the checks on that restriction is more reasonable than scrapping the entire system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What concerns me is the way they have set up an infrastructure that can only be used as a dragnet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank you for posting the poll on this issue
Spying on Americans is not what FISA was created for. I do hope the bastardization of the bill will be corrected in the next congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Augdog20 Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. Times on Obama's centrist picks
Check out NY Times article posted to my blog; cites centrist trend:

http://bluesunited.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not so much centrist as it is pragmatic.
The FISA vote was maneuvered to come up last summer to embarrass the Democrats. Obama chose not to take the bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC