Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Chart".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:28 PM
Original message
"The Chart".


Not sure if this has been posted in image format yet.
Download the PDF from http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070316173308-19288.pdf , linked at http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1205&Issue=Disclosure+of+CIA+Agent+Identity

Please grab this image & redistribute so as not to kill my photobucket account!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I noticed right away how Cheney and Rove seemed to get their infomation
...out of thin air
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the black square labeled "Unknown"...........
...eeeepppp....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. And Libby is going to jail to protect "Unknown's" identity?
I assume "Bush" is off playing his Gameboy or something, why isn't that jackass on the list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. No, Libby's protecting Cheney who no doubt told him to leak Plame's identity.
Scooter didn't leak her identity on his own initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks...
This is great. I saw it on TV, but couldn't read everything....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. THANKS forposting this chart. I saw it on CNN & MSNBC. but it was
way too small and only up for a short time. NOW I have a chance to actually read it. It's a very good way of pulling a very spotty story together and makes it easy to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Aren't visual aids great nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. This whole chart is a question.
And, it's the right question.

Someone's going down, and I think people are working hard not to be first in line.

I can't wait to see DU's annotations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. I can't wait for DUers to work on this chart as well. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks, that makes things clearer
and given that this case is becoming increasingly complicated, that's helpful.

The "Unknown" is worrying though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you!
What busy treasonous beavers they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks! Copied to my photobucket account, too ...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Colorful web of conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It'd be better with "leak sequence numbers" on it.
It'd take research but if every arrow were labeled "1" "2a" "2b" and so on, it'd make even more sense. An appendix that described each leak, in order, would be an awesome reference ... a really good addendum to DU's Research Forum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. They forgot Tweety
Afterall, the chart makes it quite obvious...Wilson's wife was fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Matthews wasn't leaked to. He was on Scooter's shit list.
Rove told Matthews "Wilson's wife is fair game" after Novak's column was published.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. thanks, I was looking for this earlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is the unknown
Kyle Foggo? Where is he these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Indicted just a month ago today
Carole Lam's last hurrah before being pushed out of the US Attorney's office.

Thanks, Carole! Happy one-month anniversary, Dusty! Hope you celebrate next Feb 17 inside a cell!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/13/cia.foggo/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. frontpage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Insert State Department Memorandum shared on Africa trip.
Some people get more arrows pointing at their box.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeG5385 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think Cheney met her and knew exactly who she was
Look at the chart. After all, this is the group at the CIA he was leaning on they knew he made inquiries about Niger and I'm sure many other things that could not be discussed at today's hearing and they probably felt the pressure of his "numerous" visits.

I got the feeling that whether Val had previously met Cheney specifically was a question that could not be asked today.

Think about it, she's a senior undercover officer in counterproliferation dealing with Iraq WMD, why wouldn't he know her?

Could it be he purposely took down the network that could prove him a liar? Now THAT is TREASON....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yep. That's what I think, as well.
I was disappointed that Valerie Plame wasn't asked when and where, if at all, she'd met any of the individuals on that chart. I've gotta believe Cheney was briefed and she was present and introduced during one or more of the six or seven personal visits he made to Langley, if not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. They Had An EXTENSIVE List Of Things They COULDN'T Ask
I'll bet the Cheney question was on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. I'm offended!
Why does the "Unknown" have to be shaded in black huh?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I Dunno... I Somebody's Darker Than Darth Cheney...
I'm gonna have some serious nightmares tonight!

:hide::scared::wow::scared::hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. "Operation Human Shield...
... my ass!" :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Swamp!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
28. Maybe when we refer to the "unknown" we should just type * to represent them nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
29. Added to my photobucket too and then posted
in the DU Research Forum under CIA Leak.

Ain't this a grand chart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. This is a good time to re-read "The Stovepipe" by Seymour Hersch
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2003/10/27/031027fa_fact

It may shed some light now on who Unknown may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. Kick!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. My, my, my...
Gregory made the chart, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. Dan Bartlett is missing from this chart.
He told Fleischer also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
37. Soooo.....a list of all the possibilities for UNKNOWN?
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 03:44 PM by Hepburn
Could we do that and see where we go from there?

My first thought was *, but that does not seem to fit. It had to be someone from the CIA that originally gave out the info. So, I say either George T or Foggo.

Opinions????

Edit for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. I thought Armitage told Pincus? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
39. First, thanks for the easier to read chart.
I guess I wasn't the only one squinting at screen shots. :D

Now, my :tinfoilhat: began to tingle when another poster asked where shrub would get his info. My first thought was from senior bush; former CIA director and I've read somewhere, he still receives regular briefings?

I don't know Valerie Plame's history with the CIA - was she there when senior was? Is that where shrub got his info?

Again, just a bit of a tingle to address.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC