Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Subpoena Bush.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:39 PM
Original message
Subpoena Bush.
Bring him in and explain why there was no internal investigation in the White House.

Give him the Toensing treatment. If he tells the truth, nail him over Plame. If he lies, nail him for Perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't see how the hell they are going to wiggle out of this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was so nice of the gop to set the precedent of subpoening a President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, I'm loving the irony.
Of that, and Bush officials getting convicted of perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That applies only in when there is oral-genital contact ...
American getting raped by the Bush crime family doesn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I did not have treasonous relations with that woman, Ms Plame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thats right
Have him explain why he said there was an ongoing investigation when there was clearly not. How can he possibly answer that one, especially after today (he can no longer use those that were at the hearing as a scapegoat).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe they have that authority
Due to separation of powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Heh.
Check up thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC