Shouldn't the Dems ask Zalmay Khalilzad about his PNAC connections while under oath?

[NNN0LHI]

I am watching him testify right now on CSPAN2 and the questioners so far are just tossing softballs to this thug. I think the Dems should get this fecker on record as far as his PNAC views while they have the chance.

Don

[NNN0LHI]

1. Even Russ Feingold was polite and tossed softballs to this thug

PNAC must be a taboo subject in DC?

Don

[Hubert Flottz]

2. I was thinking the same thing...

This dude is as bad as the last rat!

Edit to add link...

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

[The2ndWheel]

3. Why would they do that?

Biden put his name on one of their statements. Schumer is involved with a think tank with a bunch of PNAC guys and and gals. PNAC is just about empire. One particular form of empire, sure, but still empire. Every time a Democrat says we have to be the leader in this or that global category, that means empire. One particular form of empire, sure, but still empire. They either don't have time to read about PNAC(they had no time to read about the Patriot Act), or they agree with the general principles behind PNAC. Lets be honest, America wouldn't exist without PNAC type expansion. To question PNAC would be to question the very foundations upon which the last great hope for humanity was built. That's never going to happen. At least not in the halls which were built for that type of expansion.

[muriel_volestrangler]

4. What do you think he would say that he hasn't already?

The notable thing about the PNAC was how publicly people signed on to it - and it published papers and so on.