Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dallas Morning News: "Ms. Palin would be wise to quit trying to spin her way out of this mess."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:14 PM
Original message
Dallas Morning News: "Ms. Palin would be wise to quit trying to spin her way out of this mess."
Editorial

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin claims the Troopergate investigation clears her of wrongdoing in the firing of her public safety commissioner, which it does not.

The state ethics panel investigation – a bipartisan effort started by a Legislature controlled by her own Republican party – found that though she was technically within her rights to fire the man, she violated state ethics law and abused her power in doing so.

Specifically, the report found, the governor allowed her husband, Todd, to strong-arm government employees in an effort to get someone to fire a state trooper, Michael Wooten, who was going through an ugly divorce with the governor's sister. The state investigator rejected the Palin family's claims that Trooper Wooten was a personal threat, concluding that the governor misused her authority "to advance a personal agenda."

Ms. Palin would be wise to quit trying to spin her way out of this mess. It would be far more plausible if she admitted error but said she and her husband acted out of fear – perhaps misplaced – for the family's safety. But to claim vindication when the report is actually fairly damning should give even McCain-Palin supporters pause.

The temptation to use public power to settle private accounts bedevils all politicians. This Troopergate imbroglio is eerily reminiscent of the 1993 Travelgate scandal involving first lady Hillary Clinton. Her behind-the-scenes machinations against the White House Travel Office – engineering the dismissal of career employees, apparently for the benefit of the Clintons' Arkansas cronies – were legal but unethical.

Just because something is legal on paper, of course, doesn't make it right....


http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-trooper_14edi.State.Edition1.24f8dd2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's gone even further -- I heard her allege she was cleared of ETHICAL wrongs too
It was an audio clip (maybe Randi played it), but she claimed
that she had been exonerated of all wrongdoing -- both legal
AND ethical, which is a flat-out LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently, violating ethics laws is not illegal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mellowfellowO Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If it were...
There'd be no politicians ANYWHERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yep. On point. She has been blase about this almost non-story in the MSM, yet
it goes right to her judgment as an executive. Geez, her husband was pretty much stalking the guy for some damning info. And dipping into the situation on a personnel level no private citizen should be allowed to access. Apparently Gov. Palin saw no problem.

Make no mistake, folks, they're thugs. Good looking thugs, but thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can a separate suit be filed by the state for abuse of power?
Seems to me there are plenty of grounds for such an action. She may have been within the law to fire the former brother-in-law, but wouldn't abuse of power be a separate issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC