Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, does this 940-point rebound prove that Socialism works?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:31 PM
Original message
So, does this 940-point rebound prove that Socialism works?
What are the freemarketeers saying about this historic, record-breaking, one-day jump that comes in the wake of an historic, record-breaking, one-day infusion of public money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its not socialism until we share in the profit. Let's see if that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. True--good point
Then let me rephrase the question: does this prove to the freemarketeers that we have Socialism for the rich and for corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. people grabbing stuff cheap
looking to sell short or for the "big rebound"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. We are going to regret this later
That's what CNBC pundits are saying.

They look like they have all sucked on a bushel full of lemons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. just for the record.... I regret it NOW
and have all along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. me too
while this makes people feel better on the short term, we've screwed ourselves royally long term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, it proves the market is a short-term craps shoot
It is a crazy place and today was the day that calmer heads made lots of money off the panic selling of last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's my impression as well
The ones who wait a few minutes don't get trampled when someone yells "fire!" in the theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lldu Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. No! Watch it go down tomorrow ....................N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. It shows that the Brits did it the right way
I don't know if it is fair to say it is fascist versus socialism. But what we know for sure is this.

A $700 trillion bailout that had no specific plan, no assurance of good execution, nor clearly identified purpose, not particular problem it as trying to solve, and no definite time-line fell flat on its face. And I guess the American taxpayers are out the $700 trillion with nothing to show for it.

On the other hand, the British plan attacked the problem head on. It started with the premise that the banks had been mismanages -- a premise that seems obvious on the face of it. And that led them to the solution that has been applauded by free markets all over the world, include the American stock market. Let's recap the main points:

- The British government (the taxpayers) are taking an EQUITY interest in the banks. This provides an immediate cash infusion that will allow the banks to get back on their feet.

- But because of the equity position, the existing shareholders will only profit from this infusion if the bank turns itself around. The existing shareholders do not profit from the past mismanagement.

- If the banks become solvent, they will buy out the government equity position and the British taxpayers will be whole.

- The existing executives will be sacked without parachutes. The second tier of executives will have all bonuses frozen.

And here's the key provision that attacks the problem head on. If they take this money, they have to resume lending to the public and other banks at the same rate they did in 2007. They can't just grab the cash and run.

This is the right way to do it. Well done Great Britain. Now that we see almost universal approval of this this program, how about we take another vote on our program. Kill the Paulson plan and adopt the UK plan. It is clearly the right solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. agree--and the markets are hoping we can be smart enough to follow their lead
without letting our absurd history of red-baiting get in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Just a point, there.
It's $700 billion with a "b", not $700 trillion with a "holy fuck that's alotta money."

I wouldn't otherwise mind, but we are talking three orders of magnitude there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thanks. As the old saying goes
A billion here and a billion there. Pretty soon, you're talking about real money. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. On the plus side, our officials have already dropped TARP..
and are planning to recapitalize instead of just buying up toxic assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Very informative post MindMatter
appreciate the good explanation.

"This is the right way to do it. Well done Great Britain. Now that we see almost universal approval of this this program, how about we take another vote on our program. Kill the Paulson plan and adopt the UK plan. It is clearly the right solution."

I completely agree.



Thank you,

Alyce

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. no, it just proves that when you remove fear of failure
or even the possibility, that people will jump on the bandwagon...the problem is, if you can't fail, you really cannot win either.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. uh, no, it is state run capitalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. um ... what's your bet on the size of the profit-taking drop Tuesday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bulls make money
Bears make money
Pigs get slaughtered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Pigs get fattened up..
Hogs get slaughtered..in theory anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Do you think it'll keep going up, or that the trend is up?
Giving money to the rich is not socialism. It's national socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. More like Corporatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Let's not call this a Market anymore. Let's call it what it truly is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC