http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/10/an_oregon_arrow_maker_suffers.html Dishion says the provision wasn't a tax break for his company as the critics have claimed. It was a tax repeal that corrected a mistake in the taxation of the little-known arrow industry.
"This is just righting a wrong," Dishion said. "We've been fielding all the phone calls and trying to explain what the situation is. Some of them get it. Some of them don't want to get it. They should be saying thank you."
The flap reveals the misinformation circulating about what the 43-cent tax repeal is really about, according to Jay McAninch, president of the Archery Trade Association. "It's amazing how complicated a little tax could be," McAninch said. "And how few people understand it. The fact of the matter is it's an important tax bill for a needed program. This isn't a pork barrel."
The tax became a problem for Rose City and a handful of other companies in 2004, when lawmakers, while trying to correct another problem with the arrow tax, changed a 12 percent tax on all arrows to a flat 43-cent tax on arrow shafts. The tax, which got tacked on to every arrow shaft, goes to fund educational programs put on by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The change hit the youth archery market particularly hard, doubling the cost of arrows used by kids. That's the lowest-cost segment of the archery market and just a small part of the nation's $500 million archery industry.
Rose City Archery's wooden arrow shafts sell for 30 cents. The 43-cent tax took a huge toll on its youth archery business, Dishion said. The company also manufactures adult hunting arrows that retail for about $12.
In 2004, Dishion said, the company sold 1 million arrow shafts. This year, the company sold 100,000.
"When the price of the arrow doubled, the Boy Scouts, the summer camps, the school programs started canceling archery programs," Dishion said.
Not such a joke when you go to the trouble to try and understand it. The measure concerning the wooden arrows was one that never had any opposition and just happened to end up in the bailout bill. I wonder how many other items are as easily dismissed as being just pure pork putting taxpayers' bucks in someone's pockets?