Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bailout package unlikely to significantly curb executive pay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 04:37 AM
Original message
Bailout package unlikely to significantly curb executive pay
Source: USAToday.COM

High pay and "golden parachutes" for poor-performing executives in finance and other industries still is a big issue, but the bailout bill passed Friday by the U.S. House likely won't rein in overpaid Wall Street moguls. Compensation consultants who work with companies on pay packages say the bill's sections on executive compensation are so broadly and vaguely written that executives and companies will create dozens of new ways to boost leaders' pay anyway.

"This is tinkering around the margins, without really taking a fundamental look at executive compensation plans," says Howard Sherman, CEO of the Governance Metrics International.

<snip>
"All the bite has been taken out of the bill," says Paul Hodgson, senior research associate at The Corporate Library, a corporate-governance research firm. "There are so many loopholes."

Last year, the top tier of executives at Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns made a total of $613 million, or an average of $123 million for those investment banks, says Graef Crystal, a pay expert and author of The Crystal Report on Executive Compensation. That's three times the average in other industries.





Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2008-10-03-bailout-ceo-pay_N.htm



History will show us that Paulson sold out his country to benefit his Wall Street cronies. What a legacy the * administration is leaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought they included
a clause under which high payments which have come about as a result of this fraudaulent scam, going back to 2003, would now be taxed at 90% retrospectively with up to 10 years, on request, for the culprits to pay back tax. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Really??? I'm so shocked!
But... but... they promised! :eyes:

Big, resounding Duh!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. No kidding.
There are also out clauses for several of the other things we wanted. Oversight is questionable, and who gets the job of 'aiding' the federal government- the same people who cooked up these schemes. They're going to get billions in consulting and whatever else. Win on the way up, win on the way down.

The bill went from three pages to over four hundred. I think I'd rather have the three pages back, at least then you could see clearly how you were getting screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chupacabranation Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Really well-said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Bailout package unlikely to __________" will be a recurring theme.
BOON-doggle!!

Money to pay off Bush friends and lard for the late collaborators in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC