Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are we transitioning to a military-only economy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 04:19 PM
Original message
Are we transitioning to a military-only economy?
While everyone was focused on the $700 billion Wall Street bailout bill, President Bush simultaneously signed into law a $615 billion military spending bill, one of 3 such bills to be signed by the end of the year! While people have been calling for an FDR-like jobs creation program, something similar may be about to happen within the military sector. According to Chalmers Johnson, this reflects an incredible failure of the mass media and press to inform the people what really has been driving our nation into bankruptcy:

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=2450

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellaydubya Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unbelievable.................
Please let this madness cease- are they going to do as much damage as possible before they leave office and lose the power-----------this is a criminal offense, if I ever saw one. I am sickened.:evilfrown: :mad: :wtf: :hurts: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. We've had a permanent war economy since the 1950's
It's been unabated and is not in any danger of ceasing.

Not just for the US, but also for the weapons that we sell around the world.

Death and destruction is a sure fire money maker.

It funds our revolving list of permanent enemies, it cripples any chance of building a social safety net.

It controls this country in more ways that anyone will ever know.

The economy is filtered through the Pentagon where I worked for seven and a half years.

Bush is only doing what he's paid to do; what every president after FDR was paid to do... Feed the monster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Transitioning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. When the majority of Americans move from serving the private sector...

to serving the public/military sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't know if that is actually possible
but as far as controlling the major expenditures, we are already there, especially as we are adding in contracting and the surveillance society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree, but I wonder if suddenly....

a lot of bankers and businessmen with few direct ties to these industries are beginning to wonder what is really happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't know. I do know that we're at a real vulnerable time right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. That was my thought. And it scares me
with the Iraqi trained 1st Combat Brigade here, at Ft Stewart Ga., ready to be called to action on our own soil, and 10,000 Nat'l Guard controlled by Northland, ready to help them deploy the special, secret new weaponry, some of which surely includes some form of microwave tech... well I am having a hard time keeping happy and calm lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. That may be the plan, but it can't work. All military spending represents a net loss.
There is no payback, no appreciation of assets, it's rather like trying to earn a living by buying new cars at retail and selling them as used at wholesale.

Each deal eats capital and you only last as long as your capital.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I would agree except....

where American hegemony also serves not only our own energy needs, but those of the world.

http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/beyond_american_hegemony_5381


High levels of defense expenditures are not merely to overawe potential challengers...To again quote from the 1992 Defense Planning Guidance, "we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order." Reassurance, the second prong of the hegemonic strategy, entails convincing major powers not to build up their military capabilities, allowing the United States to assume the burdens of ensuring their security instead.

...And the Persian Gulf War was, among other things, a reassurance war on behalf of Japan -- far more dependent on Persian Gulf oil than the United States -- confirmed by the fact that Japan paid a substantial portion of the United States’ costs in that conflict. Today, the great question is whether or not two other Asian giants -- India and China -- will eschew the development of true blue-water navies and continue to allow the United States to take responsibility for keeping the Gulf open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Even accepting that premise, military spending is the least efficient
way to do this.

Our military, or MIC, is a black hole. There is no limit to how much we can pour into it and it will not return anything but death & destruction.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Not necessarily according to Keynes
The people who make their income from working for the military industrial complex can spend their money on other parts of the economy.

Although it would still be a lot more productive if we invested that money into infrastructure and education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Of course they do, but what they earn is an insignificant factor of what is spent.
We would see better churn if we just wrote a check to those workers to not work. At least that way they would be making the same contribution to currency circulation without the attendant costs of what they produce.

The most relevant aspect is that what they are making has no economic value. Military material products only have two results, one, they are used and are a total loss, or two, they are stored for future use requiring additional expense (storage and security) and are eventually obsolete or are used, again resulting in a total loss with additional cost.

A road is used for decades and supports the entire community, a bullet is gone forever.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Isn't Nukes, Bombs, Fighter Jets and the like the only thing we still build here in AMERIKA?
Seems likely.... We gotta keep those armaments going...to build up the "defenses of other countries" so our ECONOMY can keep going.

What happens when Average American finally figures out this Boondoggle? Meaning, the average Fox and other Cable TV viewers? Even PBS and C-Span Viewers. When this cat gets outta the bag...........gonna be interesting for the generations behind us, isn't it. :-( I say this sadly...but it's what it is.

Read Howard Zinn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. The millitary is how the Right does Keynesian economic stimulus without...
...threatening the economic power of their corporate masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. More info from Beaufort (SC) Gazette
A$612 billion defense bill passed both houses of Congress late last week, and included a 3.9-percent pay raise for military personnel, $70 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and $3.2 billion for new military housing and tuition assistance. Additional legislation will be needed to appropriate the money.

The resolution, co-authored by Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., called for the recognition of"the success of the troop surge in Iraq and its strategic significance ... as a strategic victory in a central front of the war on terrorism."

In a statement, DeMint said the resolution was only part of the reason for his "no" vote, citing $5 billion in "secret earmarks," funding cuts for security forces' training and inflexibility for ground commanders as other factors.

The bill gave the Marine Corps more than $1.4 billion and $1.1 billion to the Navy and Marine Corps to spend on ammunition in the 2008-09 fiscal year, which began Wednesday and ends Sept. 30.

Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort and Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island rely on the federal funding, both for military construction projects and for the bases' general operating budgets.

Parris Island will receive $53.5 million in operational and maintenance funds this fiscal year, said Keith Bass, comptroller for the depot.

Bass said that figure does not include $52.7 million for the Eastern Recruiting Region or additional funds for military construction projects. In addition to being a basic training facility, the depot serves as the headquarters for the Corps' Eastern Recruiting Region, which encompasses Puerto Rico and the United States east of the Mississippi River.

Headquarters Marine Corps in Virginia declined to release information on scheduled military construction projects in South Carolina in the fiscal year until the bill was signed, and information on Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort's 2008-09 fiscal year operating budget was not made available.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. $350 Million for the 1st Combat Brigade, 3rd Infantry's homeland base
Oct 02, 2008
Defense Bill Passes; Ft. Stewart (Georgia)Gets $350 Million

The bill also includes the following Georgia specific funding:

$2.9 billion for 20 F-22A’s
$1.5 billion for seven AF Joint Strike Fighters
$508 million for six MC/HC-130J’s
$429 million for C-5 modernization
$1.4 billion for six Navy Joint Strike Fighters
$120 million for two KC-130J’s
$264 million for seven Joint Cargo Aircraft for the Army
$925 million for 63 UH-60 Blackhawk Helicopters for the Army
$81 million (R&D) and $30.7 million (Procurement) for JSTARS
$523M for long lead procurement for an additional 20 F-22’s in FY10
$5 million for Advanced Surface to Air Missile Hardware Simulator Development conducted by the Georgia Institute of Technology
$3.5 million for Range Element Network Enterprise Technology to benefit the Georgia National Guard
$2.0 million for Composite Tissue Transplantation for Combat Wound Repair to be performed by Emory University
$2.0 million for the Nanotechnology Manufacturing Center in Swainsboro, Ga.
$3.0 million for the Advanced Bio-Engineering enhancement of soldier survivability project to be conducted by the Georgia Institute of Technology
$2.0 million for Combat Arms Training Systems manufactured by Meggitt Training Systems in Suwanee, Ga.
$4 million for the C-130 Large Aircraft Countermeasures (LAIRCM) System which will benefit National Guard and Reserve C-130 units in Georgia
An additional $20 million in the Joint STARS budget to perform research and development related to integrating the MP-RTIP radar on a large aircraft, such as Joint STARS.
$2.0 million for Morehouse College Hopps Defense Research Scholars Program
$884.92 million in new military construction funding for Georgia, plus an additional $300M in BRAC and War-related military construction funding

http://www.thecreativecoast.org/savannahnews/view/1257-defense-bill-passes-ft-stewart-gets-350-million
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. How much of that is intended for domestic military operations?

will "The South" rise again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Hard to tell, but nobody here seems to get it...
this $$$$$$$ might be used against us on our own turf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. like george carlin said, it's the only thing we do well.
we can't teach our kids or build anything, but we can bomb the crap out of other countries!

specialization, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. teeny amount
when compared to gdp and wealth generated from commerce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. 750 overseas bases...
2 1/2 million servicemembers worldwide...probably a Trillion bucks a year counting black ops and off-budget stuff and nuke stuff and Fatherland Security.

The US simply cannot maintain this empire... we can't afford it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. We're catching up with North Korea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hey, not just military!
We put each other in jail and sell each other cheap poisoned Chinese crap too! We are sooooooo diversified!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick for Sunday n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Part II of Chalmers Johnson interview here...

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=2494

He mentions the use of the military budget as an incredibly expensive jobs program and payment for weapons that are practically worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. transitioning?
we've been there since Ike left office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. Maybe military, fast food and porn.
Thanks to outsourcing and 'insourcing', there aren't many jobs left that can pay the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. What's insourcing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC