Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We're going over the edge"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
willing dwarf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:29 AM
Original message
"We're going over the edge"
This from Krugman on his blog at the NY Times:

A Grim Morning

Double plus ungood news on multiple fronts this morning. The credit crunch is getting worse: LIBOR jumped again, the TED spread is at a new record. Bad news on employment: payrolls down 159,000, average work week down, official unemployment rate flat at 6.1 percent but broad measure (U6) up from 10.7 to 11

link: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/

-------

I know there are people around here who see the need for gov't intervention as another fake crisis, and I too have grave doubts considering the messengers, but if Krugman says we're going over the edge, it feels to me like we're sliding down into the crack of doom.

Let's hope the US economy can make like a phoenix and somehow emerge with a fresh strong new perspective on the tired old earth despoiling shape of pre September 08 capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure anyone at this board thinks something shouldn't be done. It's just what
that something ought to be. Many of us feel the economy would benefit more from modest borrowers being shored up a bit rather than Wall St. high-rollers being bankrolled again, on nothing but their word that this time, they'll try to get it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willing dwarf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Wouldn't it be great if they really could do both?
I know, we've been over this furrow a hundred times, but it still feels like fresh ground. -- If the govt had acted on behalf of all of us last year, then the gun that's pointed at our heads now would be a little easier to acede to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, we are going over the edge alright...
but the question is will this bailout help or hurt the fall yet to come? The fall is coming regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is not a drill
and it's not just the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I agree that we're slipping into hell, but
it hasn't been sufficiently explained to me how the "rescue package" is going to do anything besides give a blood transfusion to a patient that's bleeding from like a million sucking wounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Payrolls down 159,000
What many people overlook is that the population of the country grows every month. Anything less than a job-gain--a job gain--of about 80,000 to 100,000 per month is an even greater shrinkage of the work force than the experts are saying. That's why we've been in a "practical recession" for many months now. When was our last job growth of 100,000 plus in a month (...I can't remember). Again, most people think of these numbers in static terms, but the nation continues to grow rapidly in population and is anything but static.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's what Mr Obama says: "They need to own their failure."
Unless that happens, we will just be saving their asses for the next round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Krugman lost his credibility for me during the primaries. I read his columns with a large grain of
salt. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. his credibility as an economist?
or as a pundit?

they are two different things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. He lost some credibility when he said..
there was no speculation in the oil market and that the price was all demand based.

Since, we've learned that not to be the case.

I think he's right more often than he's wrong.

I do agree that action should be taken, but I disagree that this is the right action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, I used to worship the guy.
But he's lost me on several points recently. He was really annoyingly pro-Hillary -- it's fine that he supported her, but he could have done it without denigrating the person who actually became the candidate.

The idea that the oil market is just "demand-based" is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. He lost his credibility because of his attack on Obama's health care policy?
Does that make him less credible on the econonic crisis? How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe we could - if weren't being held for ransom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's not that people around here don't want something done, we do
However we also want a better deal. This bailout plan does nothing to address the underlying causes of our economic problems, and its implementation will actually cause a greater economic crisis than if we simply do nothing. Our bond ratings will be trashed, and we'll have no way of borrowing the money we need to run government. No money, no Social Security, no defense, nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC