Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ report: Investigators have evidence of Rove & Miers involvment in US Attorney firings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:06 PM
Original message
DOJ report: Investigators have evidence of Rove & Miers involvment in US Attorney firings

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&page=1

<snip>

Investigators found that in at least three removals, "the evidence indicates the White House was more involved than merely approving" the dismissals, as Bush administration officials "initially stated," according to a report by the Justice Department's Inspector General and its Office of Professional Responsibility released Monday.

Because Miers, Rove and others "refused to cooperate with our investigation, and because the White House declined to provide internal documents to us, we were unable to determine the role the White House played in these removals," the report concluded.

Investigators said they found evidence indicating greater-than-known White House involvement in firings of U.S. attorneys in Arkansas, Missouri and New Mexico.

In Arkansas, investigators said, "the evidence shows that the White House sought to give former White House official {J. Timothy} Griffin a chance to serve as U.S. Attorney, and that both Rove and Miers supported Griffin's appointment." Griffin had served as in the White House as an aide to Rov e. Griffin had foreknowledge of Cummin's dismissal, the report said, and in an email cited by investigators, Rove suggested Griffin to fill the potential vacancy.

In Missouri, "we found evidence that the White House may have directed {former U.S. Attorney Todd P.} Graves's removal," the report said, over a conflict with between Graves and a U.S. senator's office. White House lawyers had fielded complaints about Graves, and appear to have been involved in pushing his ouster, the report stated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r before the funeral. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Took them all this time and a report to know that? Idiots. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rec'd, though getting them to testify will be another matter. Thanks, sabra. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Quelle surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Make them testify!
from the second page:

The IG and OPR do not have prosecutorial powers and cannot compel witnesses other than Justice Department employees to cooperate with their investigators.

But Nora R. Dannehy, the acting U.S. attorney in Connecticut, who Mukasey appointed to lead the new probe, will have those powers.
Mukasey said in a statement that Dannehy would have the authority to "ultimately determine whether any prosecutable offense was committed with regard to the removal of a U.S. Attorney" and whether administration officials might have broken the law by giving misleading Congress about the firings of the federal prosecutors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Big ol' K&R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where are the arrest warrants?
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. was this report just released today?
too many people are not going to notice and not going to care when and if mukasey throws it under his rug.

DAMN! i want to see consequences for these fucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. released Friday - official release this morning - good timing, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yeah.
sonsabitches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. but will anyone notice?
but us that is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. And Muck Muck Mukasey continues to stand in the way of justice by not enforcing subpoenas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC