Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is EXACTLY Why Bush and McCain Wanted To Privatize Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:11 PM
Original message
This is EXACTLY Why Bush and McCain Wanted To Privatize Social Security
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 04:18 PM by IWantAnyDem
It had nothing to do with "saving Social Security".

It had EVERYTHING to do with saving the finance industry long enough for another election to slip through. They knew back in 2005 there was no way the finance industry would survive through the next election without a major infusion of cash, so the intent was to raid the Social Security Trust Fund to prop up the bogus finance and investment market.

They were planning on stealing everybody's retirement in order to make their cronies RICHER and prop up the economy long enough to put one more Republican into the white houes. After that, they use the powers from the Patriot ACt and the DHS to enforce virtual serfdom on the working class forever when the civil unrest erupts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. How right you are.
More stuff we'll never hear in the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. $9 trillion debt? There's no trust fund
They wanted the FICA that people are paying NOW. They want everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's the trust fund
That I trust my money will be there when I retire.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. The trust fund is what I paid in
for the last 20 years. It's the money the fed borrowed to spend, while giving tax cuts to the wealthy. A smaller portion of FICA is going to the "trust fund" every year. It will be back to paying retirees only, fairly soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely
Your analysis is, I think, dead right on. It's that simple.

Can you imagine the situation today in this country if they'd gotten away with their devious plans? It would be bedlam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, it wouldn't. Had they infused the rotten system with the SS cash
everything would be rosy red on the outside and nobody would worry about the economy.

Meanwhile, on the inside, the apple would be nearly completely eaten. In two years time would come the bedlam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You think so?
I think that infusion would have only accelerated their antics, and the fall, perhaps, might even have come sooner.

Nothing like that rush you get when your pockets are lined with other people's cash.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. ABSOLUTELY!
HAd they infused the billions of dollars into the finance and investments sector, it would ahve propped up these idiots for at least two additional years. Possibly as many as six or seven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush AND McCain. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. OP Edited appropriately
You are, of course, spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I also believed it was intended as a bonanza for wall street
and to hell what happened to living breathing Americans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yup....a ready source of real cash that would keep the paper engine fueled.
They could see the liquidity crunch coming. I'll bet that, if you research the past 5 years, Phil Gramm was also pushing privitizing SS hard. Because he knew what this deregulation would do to the markets. We got 100's of trillions of bogus paper assets that have been leverabed on a few trillions of real assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Are you seriously accusing George Bush of
knowing anything???? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No, I am accusing Paulson of running the numbers. n/t
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Wheeewhh, OK it's just that for a second there I thought.........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Look again.
Obama has indicated he will consider privatizing SS. If you think Obama (and the other Dems in the leadership like Reid and Pelosi) are going to stop this march you need to think again. Not privatizing SS is a 20th century Democratic idea with only a few real elected Dems against it.

The very first conversation I ever had with an ardent Obama supporter (21 year old male) back in February or March of 2007 told me that SS would be privatized. I asked him what he was talking about and he said he learned it as part of the training to become an Obama fellow. I pushed him for details and he acted like I was stupid because I didn't already understand that SS had to go because the baby boomers were going to bankrupt the country. I watched as this young man worked through my neighborhood pub recruiting the under 30 crowd with this particular talking point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Speak truth to power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlurker Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I have been thinking this same thing all week.
Imagine where we would be in a few years if we had fallen for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. And exactly why, now, more than ever, Americans won't go for it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think we knew that.
i.e. Enron stocks being purchased by Florida's teacher union, even after Enron was tanking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. You win first prize for best analysis.
They must have known a meltdown was coming and social security funds would shore up the market for the investors for a while. The housing market has been one huge ponzi scheme for about a decade, and even those of us who aren't financial wizards knew eventually it would fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. KR&Bookmarked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC