Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Financial Turmoil takes its toll on New York City

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:37 AM
Original message
Financial Turmoil takes its toll on New York City
from the NY Times:



September 15, 2008, 8:07 am
Bloomberg and Aides Meet on Banking Crisis
By Michael Barbaro

The banking crisis that gripped Wall Street this weekend is sending a shudder through City Hall. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and his top deputies plan to gather this morning to assess the potential economic fallout from the liquidation of Lehman Brothers and the sale of Merrill Lynch, which together employee 85,000 people, many of them in New York City.

Mr. Bloomberg was worried enough about the situation that he canceled a high-profile trip to California, where he was to meet with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger today.

The mayor’s biggest challenge: how to deal with thousands of likely layoffs over the next few weeks, and the resulting loss of tax revenue on personal income, corporate profits and real-estate transactions. If Lehman, which employees 25,000, files for bankruptcy, as expected, most of its employees could lose their jobs. And once Merrill is sold to Bank of America, the new owner is expected to cut many workers to avoid overlap. Merrill employs 60,000.

Wall Street firms — and their wealthy employees — account for about one fourth of the city’s personal income and 10 percent of the taxes — so as Wall Street goes, so goes the city’s economy.
The city already expects budget deficits to balloon over the next several years — to $2 billion in 2010 and $5 billion in 2011 — as a result of massive losses on Wall Street and the implosion of Bear Stearns earlier this year. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/bloomberg-and-aides-meet-on-banking-crisis/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. He officially endorsed Obama, right? (Bloomberg) n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good thing we have 18,000 restaurants for them to all wait tables at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But they were also the customers......
.... Now everyone will be eating at Curry in a Hurry.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Collateral damage to New York City proper:
1. Loss of tax revenues
2. Loss of revenue to restaurants, bars, cigar salons, health clubs, luxury item purchases, etc.
3. With the loss of revenue, stores and restaurants will close, with even less tax revenues to the City (see #1).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well...
Now, maybe it will revert to being a place where people live and go about their business, rather than a theme park for the obscenely wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not a good time to be heavily invested in personal real estate there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. The thing that bothers me is this.. Instead of more consolidation and even BIGGER
companies, why not BREAK THEM APART into smaller, more manageable components and jettison the the "nasty" parts..just let those fail.. and on the other side we might actually have some smaller, healthier financial institutions who, once burned, might be more responsible..

What we do now, is just sow the seeds for future failures as companies just assume other companies' monumental debt-loads..and after mega layoffs, a few years later THEY need handouts, or go belly-up themselves..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC