|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 02:35 PM Original message |
Anyone have any further news on the rumors of Sarah Palin's adultery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. National Enquirer laid it out pretty well.. but since she's a GOP no one runs with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just-plain-Kathy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I went to the supermarket yesterday and looked for the National Enquirer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yes.. I saw it. Theyr'e the only ones that talked about it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I guess people are afraid of investigating the rumors of her adultery? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. World Weekly News completely debunked the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I think she is from Mars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. What news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. From what I remember that was posted here, it's pretty much nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I don't recall Enquirer saying it was a flirtation at all nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Here's the article I'm remembering. It's not the Enquirer, but I think no one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Okay, the Enquirer doesn't say that it was mere flirtatiousness, and who are those two quoted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just-plain-Kathy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. I thought the cover said something about "it" nearly costing her her marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. Teaser ad on TV said she came to Earth on a UFO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
8. The NE said so, so it must be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The NE said John Edwards was having an affair didn't it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. so does that mean that the enquirer is always right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. No, but are you implying that the NE rumors should be put down like a sick horse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. The NE also busted Rush Limpball's pill popping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why is Sarah's Palin's adultery NOT news for mainstream media? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. uhh, how much MSM coverage did the NE story on Edwards get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Because corporate media stands to gain with GOP in office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
viking11 (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Oh I knew this would bring out *the other side* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. This isn't hate speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Hmmm I wonder how long YOU will last here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InferentialKid (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. Adultery now? What next? Bird porn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. ROFLMAO! Nothing would surprise me about the Palin Woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-09-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. I thought they said they'd be following up with more information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC