Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
postmanisu Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:18 PM
Original message
Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 12:25 PM by postmanisu
I sure didn't understand Palin. Hockey mom, well I guess that's a qualification. Do they play hockey in D.C. and uh when will she have family time for her son...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think Obama will have all kind of family time as president? Stupid argument
Being a mother is not what defines a woman. I'm sure there is hockey played in and around Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postmanisu Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obama
doesn't have a newborn. thats what I was referring too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The age doesn't matter it's still a sexist argument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postmanisu Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. sexist what?
god whatever........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoris Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. A very stupid, very sexist argument, that has so far only been asked by right-wingers (ie. Dr Laura)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warsager Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have to agree NOT SEXIST
Come on people, it is NOT sexist to think that a woman with 5 kids, including a 4 month old baby, AND a pregnant teen should not be running for Vice President. If she where a he the same truth would STILL apply. Get real. This is ridiculous. SHE SHOULD NOT RUN EVEN IF SHE WERE ACTUALLY QUALIFIED.

FAMILY VALUES MY ASS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, she should be home raising her man's babies!

I'm sorry but that argument is disgusting, whether it comes from the right or the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. This is the first time that I have heard this argument come from the left.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It speaks to her priorities. She's putting her political ambition
before everything else. God knows who's tending to that four month old, but he was being passed around like a hot potato (credit Howard Stern this AM) last night.

Everyone, man and woman, needs to strike a balance between the demands and obligations of both family and career and determine priorities. Palin has put career first. You're right That's not sexism. It's just reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's pretty sexist to say that Palin can't be VP because she has children.
I would hope we would be above all that.

I think she's unqualified for many reasons but not because she's a hockey mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warsager Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah sounds so politely PC but it's crap
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 01:18 PM by warsager
Are we that unable to speak the truth now? MAN or WOMAN no parent with those kinds of responsibilities of THAT many children including a special needs infant, and another baby on the way, MOTHER OR FATHER, should seek a job that is that demanding of time and requires that much travel. How can it be sexist when it applies to a woman or a man equally? I wouldn't want a father of a new born baby who needs extra care, plus 4 other children, including a teen about to be a mother, to take this role either.

I think our elected officials should be parents and spouses, men and women alike. But different offices call for different levels of commitment and time from their elected officials and it is foolish to cry sexist when it is clearly not. It is irresponsible of her, or any MAN, to be in the situation she is in and make this choice. It is self-serving and selfish. For a man or a woman. NO if she were a man it would not be ok for HIM to leave the care of the children to the wife or nannies. I don't believe this is a good role model for mothers anywhere.

She's a bad mother in my point of view and that matters in my opinion.

And to clarify I never said she should, "Stay home with the kids." But she should pursue a career that takes into account the other choices she made in life, such as mothering 5 children. THAT is responsible, period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I've talked with several women who felt squeamish about
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 01:24 PM by LibDemAlways
Palin for that very reason. My own Hillary supporter mom's reaction: "She and her husband have 5 children. One's a pregnant teen. One's a Down Syndrome baby. What the hell is the matter with this woman that she doesn't put her family's needs first?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warsager Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thank you
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 01:33 PM by warsager
It's nice for someone to talk sense, not politically correct garbage. Are we that far from honesty that a little truth about the situation incites cries of "SEXISM!"

Please.

To quote an awesome comment on other site, "Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yes as I understand it feminism is about treating and regarding women as equals
When you choose to have a baby, you should also choose to treat that baby responsibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yep. Every person, man and woman, needs to
strike a responsible balance between their career choices and family obligations. If you choose to have 5 children, you had damn well better take responsibility for raising them. That's just reality. I swear some of the posts on here make me think people believe kids raise themselves, when the reality is it's a big job, every bit as important and frequently more challenging than a paid one. As Jackie Kennedy famously said, "If you bungle raising your children, nothing else you do matters very much."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warsager Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Great quote and great point
What scares me is that even 'liberals' can't speak or see the truth in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I just don't get it at all. Feminism isn't about doing whatever
you damn well please no matter what your circumstances. It's about equality and the freedom to make choices taking the totality of one's circumstances into account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. As a male, I would have NEVER accepted the offer under her circumstances.
Not only would I think it more important to have more time to spend with my family, I would have abhorred the thought of putting my pregnant teenage daughter in the spotlight like that. McCain should have seen and realized that, Palin should have realized that even more so. The fact that she doesn't shows how fucked up her priorities are. I don't think this is a sexist argument at all, it would apply to both men and women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC