Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards Cancels Visit to Iowa Poverty Conference

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:30 PM
Original message
Edwards Cancels Visit to Iowa Poverty Conference
Edwards Cancels Visit to Iowa Poverty Conference

Updated: Aug 15, 2008 08:53 AM

August 15, 2008--Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards won't be coming to Iowa next month, as had been originally planned. Governor Chet Culver's office has confirmed that Edwards has canceled his visit.

Edwards has withdrawn from a conference on poverty organized by Mari Culver. Edwards was set to be the keynote speaker. Last week, Edwards admitted to having an affair with a filmmaker working on his campaign in 2006.

http://www.whotv.com/Global/story.asp?S=8846840

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah...might want to lay low for a while there, buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
:cackle:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. All he has to feed anyone is bullshit, anyway nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He knows the place would be filled with people like you
What's the point in showing up for abuse? If he DID show, you'd all call him out for being arrogant FOR showing up and distracting from the good work. Obscurity must be a drag...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. You mean a habitual liar has a hard time catching a break?
Wow. Whoda thunk it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Given The Fact That We've Had A Habitual Liar As A President......
over the last 8 years - you'd think that Edwards would be our presumptive nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Try over the last 16 years.
Bill Clinton was a lot of things, and liar is on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry, John. You go back home and lick your wounds
I supported you, just go away for a long time.

You = Fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. If he'd been the keynote speaker, what do you all think the focus would have been on?
The root causes of poverty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. His affair caused all the poverty in America.
That motherfucker.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. That's right - it killed thousands of Americans in an elective war.
No, wait - w did that.

Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Edwards was an enthusiastic cheerleader for the Iraq war
he helped W perpetrate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. And so did Obama, once he actually got a chance to vote on it.
Same as Clinton, actually.

Their choices, and ours, were limited, and still are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. bzzzzt. wrong. Obama voted with Ted Kennedy and Pat Leahy
on Iraq. And they are two of the most fervent leaders of the opposition to war. Little Johny was with Holy Joe, even sponsoring an ugly IWR with him.

There's a huge difference between those who voted and argued against going to war in Iraq and subsequently voted for some funding and those who straight out supported the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Obama and Clinton voted identically once Obama reached the Senate.
And yes, I switched topics. Call it payback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeah, and Obama and Kennedy voted identically.
But Obama and Kennedy were AGAINST going to war in Iraq. Clinton voted for it with caveats.

Edwards voted for it enthusiastically and was one of the dems in the Senate who supported bushco most wholeheartedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. And he later changed his mind.
It happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Thanks Cali for explaining that so well

My head had been in the sand ~ I am so disappointed in Edwards.

I thought he was the perfect husband. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Nonsense. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. Your rebuttal lacks content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. No, but poverty lost a good champion
If he does show up whatever he says would be viewed with cynicism. Any sincerity that he shows would be viewed as lip service.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Yup. He undermined a great thing.
See foot, pull trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShenandoahAspen Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. He did the right thing.
If Edwards HAD shown up, the focus would have been more on him and his affair than the actual event. Appearing at events like these only gives the media another excuse discuss his affair instead of issues that really affect us. He needs to lay low for a while, at least until after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't care what he does.... or says. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. He can't be trusted tto leave the house?
ho dog.

I love him anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm sure he'd rather not distract from an issue he's spent a lifetime advocating for
It's a no brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. You for got your sarcasm smilie...
Or did you? I don't know what "lifetime" of advocating you're talking about. Dude never even took a case "pro bono." Face it. Poverty was just his schtick as a means to get into the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. He did not spend a lifetime advocating for poverty elimination
unless he is younger than Jack Edwards. This was not an Edwards issue in Congress - he voted for the bankruptcy bill! You can go to the searchable Senate record (Thomas) and see how often "poverty" or "affordable" or other words are used in speeches by Senator. I did this a long time ago using 2000 and 2001 - after he was in the Senate for awhile but before he was actively running for President. Kennedy worked for programs on that, as did Kerry, Dodd, and many others. If you are looking for a populist - try Sherrod Brown or Tom Harkin. They have the records Edwards didn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. "affair with a filmmaker"
I just wonder what kind of films they were making?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. KUCINICH
Told you so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Just stay home, John.
Get out of the limelight.

I am embarrassed to admit I once supported you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. He doesn't need the poverty gimmick any more
and I really think that's all it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. He's supposed to be keynote speaker at a Houston Dem conference
Judging from this, he may want to give them a call, also:


http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6471

The local party's key fundraiser will take place September 20 this year. Every year a top figure in national Democratic politics flies to Houston to help us out. (When I volunteered two years ago, Russ Feingold spoke to us.) Enough GOP scandals exist in the county, and we can't have a guy with Edwards' new stain being our headliner if we want to win big.

Most likely, the Dems in Harris County don't stand alone in this dilemma. Chances are that he was scheduled for other speaking arrangements in the future in Texas. For those explicitly for the Democratic cause, I sincerely hope his spot is replaced.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our third quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. Has he donned the sackcloth and ashes yet?
Or is he more of the self-flagellation type? Maybe he can attend if he makes a pilgrimage on his knees.

This is so wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Obviously, the best thing for him is to lay low
at least until after the elections. With most people's short attention span, perhaps he can come back and do good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC