Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Weren't Russian troops massed for weeks on the border before the "war"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:32 PM
Original message
Weren't Russian troops massed for weeks on the border before the "war"?
Why then did Shaakavilli pick this particular time to try to annex S. Ossetia? Because US soldiers were present? Because of something mccane or rove may have told him? Because he's being bought off by big oil? Just another failure of our "intelligence" agancies? He is very strange sounding on his TV interviews, spouting talking points until he has to be shut up or interrupted by his interviewer. This whole thing stinks of an "October surprise" or some other BS right wing gimmick to scare Americans into voting repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. As fast as the Russians moved enmass
Theres no way they werent already massed on the border waiting for the signal to strike.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. There is no way that our spy sattelites weren't watching every
move they made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. i tend to believe that too
i dare say russia benefits from having these douches still in power over here too.
more idiots in charge of the USA means more for all for russia.

fascists helping fascists... that wouldnt be suprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. oh please...
I agree with your first statement; the second, well, it shows you need to study more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. nah, im sorry you havent kept up
with the changes in politics and the political terms.

what exactly would you call the russian government ?
i suppose you think the chinese are still communist as well ? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mike Whitney explains it all to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. We have satellites that can read your licence plate number
and they were surprised? Give me a break they knew exactly how many troops were on the Russian side, apparently they thought Russia wouldn't do anything since Putin was over in China or they totally underestimated the effectiveness of the Russian's response. They may have actually accomplished their goal, to find another boogyman for the sheeple to be afraid of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And ...?
It's been reported that a "high-placed US official"--which I take to mean State Dept.--said there was no Russian buildup. No rationale given.

I've also seen it said that the military didn't know if there was a build-up on not: They're focused on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and a couple of other areas. It's not just what the satellites *can* see, it's the areas they're told to image and what images people look at and analyze.

It's the same with having (a hypothetical) 14000 video cameras all over a town: You're not going to pay 50k people to make sure every video camera is watched non-stop 24/7. You're not going to have a dedicated staff making sure everything's caught on tape for all 14000 video cameras. The cameras may "see" everything, right down to the blackheads on the teenagers' noses, but that doesn't mean everything's going to be seen.

Complicating it is that there *was* a buildup of troops on both sides of the border last month, known, acknowledged, and expected. The US troops were in Georgia as part of a joint exercise with Georgia. They mostly left in the last few weeks, down to not much more than a hundred by 7 AUG. "Accidentally", the Russians had troop exercises over the mountains on the other side of the border at the same time. Did they all leave as quickly as the US troops did? Would leaving equipment and/or troops for a couple of weeks there be all that suspicious, enough to attract an analyst's attention, even were he to look?

People have to assume that we were suspicious, had satellites capturing images from N. Ossetia, and had analysts there to examine the images. *And* that they'd properly interpret having Russian troops still present in an area two weeks after military exercises.

I'm a firm believer in human non-omniscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And you believe a high-placed State Department Official
connected with this criminal Administration? I just don't buy it myself. I think they knew exactly what they were doing and badly miscalculated the Russian response. Our surrogates got their asses spanked and now they are making excuses. I heard today the US urged the Georgians not to move on S. Ossetia, I believe the opposite they screwed up and now they are covering their ass. If the Georgians would have been successful the Administration would be taking credit for it. Are you old enough to remember the Bay of Pigs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC