Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Sali: There ‘Could Be Up To Forty Barrels Of Oil In A Single Tree’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:47 PM
Original message
Rep. Sali: There ‘Could Be Up To Forty Barrels Of Oil In A Single Tree’
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/14/sali-oil-in-trees/

Rep. Sali: There ‘Could Be Up To Forty Barrels Of Oil In A Single Tree’


Bill Sali (R-ID), who is participating in the GOP’s ongoing “Drill Now” energy stunt, has a unique idea about how to bring down gas prices: extracting oil from trees. In a meeting in his Capitol Hill office, Sali reportedly told a candidate for Idaho’s House of Representatives, Byron Yankey, that there “‘could be up to 40 barrels of oil‘ in a single tree.” Yankey wrote on his campaign blog:

Congressman Sali informed us that a solution to the high price of gasoline was to make petroleum from “all those trees in our forests.” … He continued by saying there “could be up to 40 barrels of oil” in a single tree.

Sali made a similar comment in 2006:

“Forty percent of the mass of every tree in the forest is crude oil,” he said. Going after that, he said, “could put Idaho in the oil business for the first time.”

Sali is apparently confusing cellulosic ethanol with oil, so let’s review the differences for the representative:

Cellulosic ethanol is a renewable fuel “derived from the stalks and stems of plants.” Sali voted against cellulosic ethanol tax credits.

Oil is a nonrenewable fuel found in the ground. Sali received $35,000 in campaign contributions from oil and gas companies since January 2007.

Sali is prone to making outlandish statements. Last summer, he claimed that religious diversity in Congress was not “envisioned by the Founding Fathers.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh goodie!! Another sorry-ass excuse to mow down our old growth forests. Fuck Rep. Sali. ~nt~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. fine. lets start with burning his house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, oil is petroleum, right? That means "rock oil."
Let's convince him you can squeeze oil out of rocks, and sell him a boulder field somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think he's confusing oil with sap but that wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. He's is a sap, no doubt about it.
Maybe he puts maple oil on his waffles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. We could probably get a few barrels out of people too
Let's start with stupid Repubs.

Oh sorry, redundant.

Let's start with Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Take it, rape it, it's yours."

These guys wouldn't know the meaning of the word stewardship if they had to write it's meaning on the blackboard 100 times.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll have some of what he's smokin.
aint had nothing like that since the 70s.:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. how is it that people this stupid are allowed to run around without their keepers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC