Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about offering Nadar the AG position

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:23 PM
Original message
How about offering Nadar the AG position
after hearing him talk today on C-SPAN (taped from the 8th) I think he'd be a great choice. Turn him loose on all our corrupt corporations.
I was hoping Edwards would be the next AG but he destroyed that plan by failing to keep his pants zipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrazyDude Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um, no n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Um, because he's an egomaniacal nutjob?
For starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. How 'bout not?
The only thing the dude would do is investigate everybody between him and the presidency in the succession line.

The man is an egomaniacal psychopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. This may have been a good idea before he started talking like a crazyman. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. HELL NO!
How about a competent administration for once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Okay, I get it. Who then?
We need a real bulldog that can't be bought off or controlled by peer pressure to continue to look the other way.

I'll have to check in later, I have to get back to the hospital to wait for my mom to get out of surgery. She's got a great doctor so everything should go well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Patrick Fitzgerald
I like the fact that he is non-partisan, and he is tenacious. Wouldn't it be great to see him be able to go after the Bush Administration with the full weight of the Justice Department behind him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. I heard a terrific interview of him while he was in Utah. I think he'd make an excellent choice. I
hate to admit I didn't know a whole lot about him prior to his Presidential run in 2000. I had no idea how involved he was in making sure we have quality standards in our autos, including seat belts!

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/kuer/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1330916
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about deporting Nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Are you trying to blow up DU?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. How about offering Nader a one way trip to Mars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ralph Nader has not earned a spot on anyone's administration.
Perhaps if could do more than spout self-serving platitudes, then maybe.

But that's not very likely, since Ralph would do no better with the DoJ than Alberto Gonzales.

Just look at all the times he has held public office and how few people he was able to work with while doing so.

Oh, wait, that's right, Ralph has never held public office. He won't allow himself to be reduced to the level of a Paul Wellstone or Dennis Kucinich; he has too much "integrity".

And, as a public service to the sarcastically-challenged: :sarcasm:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Secretary of Commerce - MAYBE
But keep him out of the Cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. I haven't liked Nader since he destroyed my favorite car
Gm came out with the Corvair to compete with the smaller, lighter more efficient European imports and Nader destroyed it. His "raiders" are partially responsible for the heavier, less fuel efficient, "safer" big land yachts that Detroit had to bring out to answer the safety issue.



One of the best American cars ever made, and could have been the start of a trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vinylsolution Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nader isn't owned by any corporation....
... or lobbyists, and he's been working tirelessly against the misuse of corporate power for the last 40 years, so imagine what he'd do for us as Attorney General.

But would President Obama really have the cojones to appoint him?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. yeah, Mr. Integrity has no qualm taking money from repukes.
most ridiculous fucking post of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. are you attacking our nominee while promoting Nader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because he's an egomaniacal nutjob that is hated by
the majority of Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Being hated by the majority of dems is a badge of honor and integrity these days...
Particularly if you mean being hated by what's comically known as the "democratic leadership." That craven bunch of bribe-saturated Bushean accomplices and enablers doesn't have enough honor or integrity to judge a pre-school talent show without trying to fleece the parents out of their last $20 in return for a favorable vote for their kid.

They're definitely in no position to attack a guy who knows and understands them for exactly what they are and doesn't mind telling them all about it, along with an audience of millions whenever somebody at the networks fucks up and lets him speak his mind for a few seconds before cutting to another critical Edwards update.

Really, what's wrong with having one of the few beltway veterans who actually stands with the people and against corporate dominance of virtually everything of any importance left in this sorry excuse for a republic.

And who's more likely to go after the whole goddamn Bushie cesspool, Nader or some beltway insider? The typical AG appointee who's been a corporate attorney for the past 20 years.

The kind of player who's a long-time member of the same exclusive club that Cheney, Pelosi, Reid, Rumsfeld, Harman, Ashcroft, Bolton, Perle, Rove, Mr. & Mrs. Clinton, Norquist and the rest of our massuhs belong to -- the alliance of the filthy rich who've long ago stopped caring about the little people and now amuse themselves by finding ways to use the proles' labor to acquire more and more money and power.

As to his role in the great Florida election theft, Nader or no Nader, there's no way in hell Gore was going to win. This was a very well-planned right wing coup.

All the gangsters were in the right places: Jebbie, Cruella, the right crooks on the Supreme Court, Georgie's own cousin in charge of election coverage at Fux Nudes, intentionally confusing ballots in democratic counties.

ChoicePoint's successful purge of likely democratic voters from the voter rolls, stealing ballots and tossing them into the ocean, the constant delays and difficulties preventing democrats voting and the ease and speed with which GOPer cast their ballots, then the hilarious Dockers' riot featuring GOP preppie punks posing as concerned citizens demanding an end to the recount.

Do these sound like random, unscripted events to anybody? They stole the fucking thing fair and square because, as usual, they're better criminals than democrats and they're immoral scum willing to do anything at all to win. I only wish the dems had their own immoral scum to stir up a little shit of their own.

Instead we have incompetents like Our Lady of the Perpetual Botox Injection prattling happily about bipartisanship while she gets conned, out-maneuvered or strong-armed into doing the Bushies' work for them. And that's when she's not preempting all that by simply rolling over in advance and giving them whatever they demand -- and sometimes even more than they want. The Bushies have no better pals in congress than the heads of the opposition party in both the House and Senate. Who would have imagined how this sad joke would play out back in November 2006 post-election euphoria?

Nader's just a convenient distraction and scapegoat, but the fix was in and after working for at least 30 years to capture the white house, they weren't about to let anybody screw things up. If it hadn't been Nader siphoning off a few thousand votes, they would have just had to steal a few more boxes of ballots from democratic precincts.

And if all else failed, five of the Supremes were ready to commit treason to install a right wing junta against the will of the people.

I'd say that's a pretty good job of covering all the bases. And Nader's such a little fish that his presence didn't even make a ripple or affect the pre-determined outcome any more than the motion a sardine fins make affects the North Atlantic current.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nah. Give it to Bugliosi. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's too honest for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Would only we be so lucky.
Keep in mind most of DU has been brainwashed to call Nader an "egomaniacal nutjob" for no reason. And this despite the fact that he is one of the U.S.'s greatest Progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It's not "for no reason."
But I get what you mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. Nope. Don't award him for helping put Bush where he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nader should head a well funded FTC -no question in my mind about that
Though of course, that would set the corporate apologists and Nader haters heads on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC