Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who was reviled more in the 60's and 70's?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:20 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who was reviled more in the 60's and 70's?
I come from a military family, although I never served. I respect and admire the veterans who did dedicate themselves to the service of our country. I don't want to diminish in any way the sacrifice, suffering and disgraceful lack of respect that has been accorded Viet Nam Veterans in this country.

BUT, I grew up in that era and can attest that "hippie" anti-war people were hated, ridiculed, spat upon, beaten, arrested, harassed and even murdered for their views.

I'm not talking about criminals or terrorists who resorted to violence in their zeal to fight against the war. I'm talking about ordinary citizens--students, clergy, artists, musicians, housewives, working people--who opposed the war or who visibly embraced the revolutionary spirit of the times in their grooming, dress or lifestyle.

I had friends who were arrested, beaten. I was routinely ridiculed for having long hair and was myself assaulted by conservatives, merely for how I looked. I was detained against my will by police in my small hometown for protesting at a Spiro Agnew campain stop in 1972, less than a year before he resigned in criminal disgrace. I broke no law, but enjoyed the hospitality of the backseat of a police cruiser for a couple of hours until Agnew flew on the his next stop.

Those who protested the war deserve a measure of our credit and our respect for having had the courage to oppose injustice and to become agents of necessary social change. We need to look beyond the advertising caricature of the times and recall the reality. Members of the peace movement were murdered--at Kent State and in dark places and jail cells throughout the country--they were spat upon and attacked. They were a minority and viewed with distrust and ridicule by most Americans at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was and still am VVAW both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. thanks for your service
and for your commitment to peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on where you lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. some parts of the country were definitely worse than others
Those regional divides still resonate throughout our political rhetoric--"San Francisco lifestyle," "Massachusetts liberal," "Southern redneck," etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. In most of my extended family, "hippies" were reviled as subversives, but
on a family vacation one of our family's young teenagers was lost and later rescued by a small group of "hippies," all of whom knew the forests around Lake Tahoe quite a bit better than he did.

Later he said he had never encountered trees so tall (redwoods) or people that kind (his rescuers).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kind of a false dichotomy.
Many hippies were vets. And the people disrespecting both were the same people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree with the first sentence,
but not entirely with the second, at least not without some qualification.

I think ALL Americans failed to accord returning vets the respect and accolades they deserved. I knew "hippies" who indeed did think of vets as "baby killers," but I also knew many conservatives who hated returning vets for being "losers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. ...
"I think ALL Americans failed to accord returning vets the respect and accolades they deserved."

See, now back then it was like it is today. If you protested against the war, then you're "disrespecting the troops," you're "spitting on the troops." If you call Lt. Calley a "baby killer," and he was, literally, then you were calling all the troops "baby killers."

It was all a load of bullshit. Then and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I think you may be wrong,
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 02:46 PM by Sapere aude
Many people protested the war but accepted vets with open arms. I was one of those vets. The idea was to learn from the experience and teach others. Some vets did not join the anti war movement and some did.

Most people when they learned the truth about My Lai thought Calley was a murderer and so were the troops that killed the villagers but that did not necessarily attach to all vets. There were many people who took advantage of the situation to join in the excitement of the times but who lacked any kind of real commitment to one side or the other. They just wanted to be part of the scene. I would guess it was one of those types who spat on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. I agree with that. Too many depict those days with cartoonish simplicity.
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 01:53 PM by TahitiNut
The broad-brush characterizations of various 'groups' just don't wash, really. For example, some of the most arrogant wannabe Rambos were veterans who never set foot in Viet Nam. They often didn't have a clue. The "anti-war" crowd came from both the right and the left - it was "Johnson's War" after all. There is NO POLITICAL STANCE that confers blanket innocence on any group. There are assholes associated with every political position.

Besides those fallacies that abound when looking in the revisionist rear-view mirror, people forget how regional differences were enormous. The Detroit area, for example, didn't experience "the 60s" until the 70s - if then. In the SF Bay area, on the other hand, "the 60s" was already banal and retail by 1970-71 - it was fashionable even among the most politically clueless. When "counter-culture" becomes mainstream, it's no longer "counter" anything.

By around 1974, "hippie" had become a backwater epithet to denigrate anything urban, collegiate, and liberal. It was the one-size-fits-all label used to facilitate Nixon's Southern strategy - a ubiquitous replacement term for "n_____-lover." In this usage, it has almost NOTHING to do with the actual 60s counter-culture.


Here's a "hippie" from 1970 ... me, on a 3-week motorcycle trip, getting my head straight. (My ponytail isn't quite visible, nor are the love beads.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. You are the first person I know of who gets it.
I don't know of anyone who disrespected both simultaneously, but the fact that they disrespected a group of people be they vets or hippies puts them in the same crowd.

The people who disrespected vets were not the honest anti war community. They were people with their own agenda. It is too bad that we have to use todays political context to try and make some sense out of the Vietnam War era. That is way to simplistic. There were anti war people on both sides of the political spectrum as is beginning to happen more and more today. It wasn't a left vs right thing.

We seem to classify people as this: hippie, anti war, democrat, leftist; clean, pro war, republican, right wing. It wasn't that way back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. There isn't much of a difference between then and now.
Freepers are constantly going on at length about how those crazy liberals over at DU are constantly hating the troops, spitting on them, and calling them "baby killers."

It's not true now, and it wasn't true then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would say both hippies (or anti-war demonstrators in general, not all were hippies)
and returning vets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anyone against the Viet Nam war and was public about it ran the
risk of physical reprisals or sneaky reprisals and persecution by the nixon administration and the military/industrial complex. They used the FBI, local police, every dirty trick in the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. not to mention the pickup truck full of rednecks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. No shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. At the Park where we were FBI and CID have us on film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Here in Bumf**k Nebraska we had this little magazine type
thing that was published semi-regularly called the 'Hippie Survival Manual'. (I still have a copy). It explained how to avoid arrest, what to do if being hasseled by the cops, what your rights were, etc. It also had little tabloid type stories about some of our high-profile hippie types.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. My father saw a lot of "bad" in hippies:
Free love, dopers, communes, Woodstock, antiwar, anti-American, drop-outs, anti-establishment, anti-capitalism, flower children, revolutionaries, socialists, communists, equated with YIPPIEs, demonstrators, children-who-refused-to-grow-up, etc., etc.

My father was always rooting for Archie Bunker over Mike (a/k/a "Meathead").

Hippies were nearly extinct by the time I was old enough to be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I had a pretty hardcore redneck extended family
with a few exceptions

I still don't understand how these people come to think the shit they "believe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. I was a vet and a hippie
well, at least a vet with long hair, and I'd say the pro war faction was a hell of a lot nastier. I was definitely not made to feel welcome by our local american legion post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. that was what really galled me
My father was a 20+ year Air Force vet, who served during WWII, Korea and Viet Nam (although he never served in theater in Viet Nam). He wasn't the American Legion type, but the extended veteran community was like a big family . . .

. . . until Viet Nam, when, as I recall, some American Legion posts actually voted not to admit Viet Nam War vets.

Disgraceful. Thanks for your service and, hey! also for the long hair!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Impact moments Chicago- Kent State- John Kerry's Statement
100,000 of people in the streets. May Day was huge in D.C. When we toss our ribbons back. Seeing Young people beat by Chicago Cops. Seeing young kids shot to death at Kent State. These all where the big moments of the movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thank you, that is a great point.
This is one of those "framing" things we have to get around instead of thrashing around withing the wingnuts' imposed framework. They are always trying to make the strongest among us into the victims - they only succeed by managing to draw your attention away from the rest of the world.

And even if somebody did spit on a soldier, that doesn't make the war right. It is one of the most idiotic and probably urban legendary stories out there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC