Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mexico formally protests Texas execution of Mexican naitonal, in violation of International Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 03:01 AM
Original message
Mexico formally protests Texas execution of Mexican naitonal, in violation of International Court
NUEVO LAREDO, Mexico - Mexico is protesting the execution of one of its citizens in Texas despite a world court ruling for a new hearing, expressing concern for the rights of other Mexicans detained in the United States.

Mexico's Foreign Relations Department said it sent a note of protest to the State Department about Jose Medellin's case, which drew international attention because of allegations that Medellin wasn't allowed to consult the Mexican consulate for legal help following his arrest...

An international court ruled in 2004 that the convictions of Medellin and 50 other Mexicans on death row around the United States violated the Vienna Convention, which calls for people arrested abroad to have access to their home country's consular officials.

The International Court of Justice, also known as the world court, said the Mexican prisoners should have new court hearings to determine whether the violation affected their cases.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080806/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/mexico_texas_execution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HoboZombie Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. They can protest all they want
The international court can rule whatever they want to. Medellin wasn't denied access, he never asked for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Gee welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. violated the Vienna Convention!?
Medellin, 33, was condemned for participating in the 1993 gang rape, beating and strangling of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14. He and five fellow gang members attacked the Houston girls as they were walking home on a June night, raped and tortured them for an hour, then kicked and stomped them before using a belt and shoelaces to strangle them.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080806/ap_on_re_us/texas_execution

The only violation here is that some of his fellow perps are still alive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No, this has to do with the International Court of Justice and the US
All the ICJ asked was that the case be reviewed, or did you think that that would encourage liberal judges to set him free and buy him candy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Review this!

Jennifer Ertman, 14, Elizabeth Pena, 16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, we are all thrilled that those girls are dead, is that what you're implying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. To imply that would be irrational but...
asking for a review is not?

Is that what you're implying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The point of a review is the precedent it sets.
There is almost no doubt that in this specific case the man was guilty (there's never no doubt at all); it seems not unlikely that even if he had been properly tried he would still have been sentenced to death.

The harm that executing him without a review has done is that it has set a precedent for convicting other, possibly innocent, people without giving them a fair trial, or for sentencing them more harshly than would otherwise be the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. If I were the leader of Mexico
I would announce Mexico's withdraw from any and all extradition agreements.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC